Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(64,709 posts)
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 09:48 AM 4 hrs ago

Woman Who 'Credibly Accused' Trump of Sex With a Minor Reportedly Had Her Records Removed From Epstein Files

(snip)

TNR reporter Edith Olmsted wrote that “A 21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens,” Olmsted wrote. “When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.”

(snip)

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalists Roger Sollenberger and Nina Burleigh. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing — despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public.

The report went on to say that Sollenberger found the interview records “in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein.”

The FBI recorded the first interview on August 9, 2019 — “the day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell,” Olmsted wrote.

(snip)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/woman-credibly-accused-trump-sex-220809049.html

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woman Who 'Credibly Accused' Trump of Sex With a Minor Reportedly Had Her Records Removed From Epstein Files (Original Post) Uncle Joe 4 hrs ago OP
Kick dalton99a 4 hrs ago #1
a girl, not a woman. mopinko 3 hrs ago #2
A child. My heart hurts for her. Scrivener7 3 hrs ago #4
Arrrgh! Pedo-washing language strikes again! GopherGal 3 hrs ago #3
Obstruction, on the surface /nt bucolic_frolic 3 hrs ago #5
T(he)S(ick)F(uck) raping children. Somebody imprison him, now! Clouds Passing 3 hrs ago #6
And ya' know - There's more that is even worse in there. Grins 2 hrs ago #7
Yep. They will say "gawd works in mysterious ways" and that will be it. Justice matters. 1 hr ago #14
It was pretty damn convenient for there to be no camera monitoring Epstein in that cell. cstanleytech 2 hrs ago #8
Looks like we have a smoking gun. Martin68 2 hrs ago #9
It gets even shadier--From Sollenberger's substack: kurtyboy 2 hrs ago #10
So does the record exist or not? tavernier 2 hrs ago #11
kick. AllaN01Bear 2 hrs ago #12
The Reporter Is Pathetic. There Was No "Woman" With Trump, No "Woman".... ColoringFool 2 hrs ago #13
I am guessing... 2naSalit 1 hr ago #15
Wait, were some of the stolen classified files at Maralago part of the Epstein files? Rhiagel 1 hr ago #16

GopherGal

(2,858 posts)
3. Arrrgh! Pedo-washing language strikes again!
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 10:24 AM
3 hrs ago

Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens,”


A "woman" "in her early teens" translates as "a girl under fifteen" in non-pedo-apologist speak.

Grins

(9,364 posts)
7. And ya' know - There's more that is even worse in there.
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 11:29 AM
2 hrs ago

Violence and rape of girls even younger than 14.

I think that is what he is really afraid of becoming public.

And worse - If it does become public, I don’t think it will matter one bit to the MAGA faithful. And that includes the Evangelicals.

kurtyboy

(992 posts)
10. It gets even shadier--From Sollenberger's substack:
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 11:49 AM
2 hrs ago
On Feb. 27, Bondi made a big, public to-do on Fox News, claiming she and Patel had just been “surprised” to learn the FBI had “thousands of pages” of evidence in the Epstein case that they hadn’t turned over to her despite the bureau’s assurances they had provided all the available documents. She sent a letter to Patel at the time, ordering him to get to the bottom of it, and to deliver a report about his findings in two weeks. We don’t know what happened to that report.

The very next day, however, the DOJ returned to Trump troves of sensitive government documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago upon leaving office in 2021. The White House at the time would not confirm whether Trump took all the documents back, or whether he allowed the government to retain some of them.

A master Epstein evidence manifest shows the government “acquired” at least four pieces of Epstein evidence in late February and March of last year. The first is dated as “acquired” on Feb. 27, the day Bondi went public about the additional files and ordered Patel to investigate. The other three are dated March 10, as the DOJ was carrying out its five-alarm, all-hands Epstein files review — and, reportedly, scrambling to find and flag all the references to Trump.


[emphasis added]

tavernier

(14,411 posts)
11. So does the record exist or not?
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 11:55 AM
2 hrs ago

And if so, is it attainable or not?

Why are all these types of reports always so murky as far as existence and location?

ColoringFool

(503 posts)
13. The Reporter Is Pathetic. There Was No "Woman" With Trump, No "Woman"....
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 12:09 PM
2 hrs ago

Biting him.

Errors in both syntax and reality.

2naSalit

(101,490 posts)
15. I am guessing...
Sun Feb 22, 2026, 12:31 PM
1 hr ago

What we can probably find in the casket in Ivana's grave, all the evidence that's missing. Don't forget who worked as the head of the national archives during 1.0.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Woman Who 'Credibly Accus...