Woman Who 'Credibly Accused' Trump of Sex With a Minor Reportedly Had Her Records Removed From Epstein Files
(snip)
TNR reporter Edith Olmsted wrote that A 21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens, Olmsted wrote. When the woman bit down on Trumps exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.
(snip)
Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalists Roger Sollenberger and Nina Burleigh. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public.
The report went on to say that Sollenberger found the interview records in a separate database of documents downloaded from the governments public files on Epstein.
The FBI recorded the first interview on August 9, 2019 the day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell, Olmsted wrote.
(snip)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/woman-credibly-accused-trump-sex-220809049.html
dalton99a
(93,195 posts)mopinko
(73,513 posts)Scrivener7
(59,069 posts)GopherGal
(2,858 posts)A "woman" "in her early teens" translates as "a girl under fifteen" in non-pedo-apologist speak.
bucolic_frolic
(54,684 posts)Clouds Passing
(7,657 posts)Grins
(9,364 posts)Violence and rape of girls even younger than 14.
I think that is what he is really afraid of becoming public.
And worse - If it does become public, I dont think it will matter one bit to the MAGA faithful. And that includes the Evangelicals.
Justice matters.
(9,610 posts)cstanleytech
(28,350 posts)Martin68
(27,419 posts)kurtyboy
(992 posts)On Feb. 27, Bondi made a big, public to-do on Fox News, claiming she and Patel had just been surprised to learn the FBI had thousands of pages of evidence in the Epstein case that they hadnt turned over to her despite the bureaus assurances they had provided all the available documents. She sent a letter to Patel at the time, ordering him to get to the bottom of it, and to deliver a report about his findings in two weeks. We dont know what happened to that report.
The very next day, however, the DOJ returned to Trump troves of sensitive government documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago upon leaving office in 2021. The White House at the time would not confirm whether Trump took all the documents back, or whether he allowed the government to retain some of them.
A master Epstein evidence manifest shows the government acquired at least four pieces of Epstein evidence in late February and March of last year. The first is dated as acquired on Feb. 27, the day Bondi went public about the additional files and ordered Patel to investigate. The other three are dated March 10, as the DOJ was carrying out its five-alarm, all-hands Epstein files review and, reportedly, scrambling to find and flag all the references to Trump.
[emphasis added]
tavernier
(14,411 posts)And if so, is it attainable or not?
Why are all these types of reports always so murky as far as existence and location?
AllaN01Bear
(29,079 posts)ColoringFool
(503 posts)Biting him.
Errors in both syntax and reality.
2naSalit
(101,490 posts)What we can probably find in the casket in Ivana's grave, all the evidence that's missing. Don't forget who worked as the head of the national archives during 1.0.