Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Actually, Democracy Dies in H.R. (NYT)
New research sheds light on how mediocre employees help would-be authoritarians maintain power. (New York Times)In Russia, Vladimir V. Putin needs his circle of handpicked oligarchs; in Iran, the Revolutionary Guards and its allies in the business world protect the regimes power; Viktor Orban transformed Hungary into an elected autocracy with the help of a few crucial judges, political enforcers and friendly tycoons. But to actually carry out the dirty work of consolidating and maintaining power, such leaders rely on help from a far greater number of lower- and midlevel people: military officers, secret police and bureaucrats.
Yet until recently, researchers paid little attention to how leaders convince and recruit ground-level workers to go along with their demands. The incentives for elites to stay loyal have been studied extensively, but the rank and file have remained something of a black box. In the absence of real data, researchers have tended to assume that they cooperate because of ideological extremism, fear of persecution or some combination of the two.
New research, drawing on an extraordinary data set from Argentinas Dirty War in the 1970s and 80s, suggests a very different explanation. It turns out that the kinds of career pressures familiar to employees everywhere the desire to revive a stalled career or obtain a minor promotion can be enough to incentivize lower- and midlevel officials to violate professional obligations, fundamental norms and even basic morality. The people who make those decisions, the research suggests, are neither extremists nor victims. They are often just middling workers looking for a way to get ahead.
...Their in-depth study of Argentinas military during that countrys era of coups and forced disappearances found that low performers whom they refer to as career-pressured individuals filled the ranks of the secret police. That service allowed them to detour around the ordinary military hierarchy, the book shows, achieving promotions and career success they could never have managed otherwise.
Yet until recently, researchers paid little attention to how leaders convince and recruit ground-level workers to go along with their demands. The incentives for elites to stay loyal have been studied extensively, but the rank and file have remained something of a black box. In the absence of real data, researchers have tended to assume that they cooperate because of ideological extremism, fear of persecution or some combination of the two.
New research, drawing on an extraordinary data set from Argentinas Dirty War in the 1970s and 80s, suggests a very different explanation. It turns out that the kinds of career pressures familiar to employees everywhere the desire to revive a stalled career or obtain a minor promotion can be enough to incentivize lower- and midlevel officials to violate professional obligations, fundamental norms and even basic morality. The people who make those decisions, the research suggests, are neither extremists nor victims. They are often just middling workers looking for a way to get ahead.
...Their in-depth study of Argentinas military during that countrys era of coups and forced disappearances found that low performers whom they refer to as career-pressured individuals filled the ranks of the secret police. That service allowed them to detour around the ordinary military hierarchy, the book shows, achieving promotions and career success they could never have managed otherwise.
Well, that kinda explains a lot, especially ICE.
The article discusses a book written using the data from Argentina and comparing the creepy phenomena observed there to other authoritarian and proto-authoritarian regimes, pointing out that routing the lowest performers into "dirty work" jobs often resulted in them doing a few years of torturing and disappearing and terrorizing citizens and then leapfrogging former military/bureaucratic colleagues with the rank earned by being shitty human beings.
Apparently, it's a pattern - the NKVD in Soviet Russia, the National Socialists in Hitler's Germany, etc. all benefited by recruiting numpties with backgrounds that disadvantaged them - things like disciplinary actions, no more than a primary schood education, not being part of the 'in crowd', etc. Sound like anyone we know?
Tyrants rely on these shitweasels for true loyalty, when the "elites" who bankrolled their rise to power get cold feet, they have a cadre of dumbfucks who know perfectly well they have zero other career options, and are willing to do vile things to please.
Similar trajectories are observed in Orban's Hungary and in Chavez' Venezuela - even where there aren't killing squads roaming the streets, the tyrants rely on their numpty minions to do the work of dismantling checks and balances, enabling grift and corruption, silencing dissent, and dismantling the functional elements of government.
And yes, the article DOES cover the current case study - America.
It's more than a little chilling.
nauseatedly,
Bright
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Actually, Democracy Dies in H.R. (NYT) (Original Post)
TygrBright
3 hrs ago
OP
It seems that being described as "otherwise unemployable" is a recommendation to ICE. nt
eppur_se_muova
1 hr ago
#3
It isn't just the having options they hate. It's the critical thinking ability. n/t
TygrBright
26 min ago
#6
DBoon
(25,143 posts)1. "The banality of evil"
as Hannah Arendt described Eichman
TygrBright
(21,389 posts)2. Yes, evil has its own gravitational field, and banality is the portal. n/t
eppur_se_muova
(42,499 posts)3. It seems that being described as "otherwise unemployable" is a recommendation to ICE. nt
NEOH
(356 posts)4. It's Called "Being Kicked Up the Ladder"
It's called "Being Kicked Up the Ladder". My mom explained it to me a long time ago.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,588 posts)5. Which also explains Republicans' hatred of higher education
The more educated someone is, the more options they have.
TygrBright
(21,389 posts)6. It isn't just the having options they hate. It's the critical thinking ability. n/t
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.