The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsThe Cure for AI writer's block... Paste this into your chats before you start...
This post is meant for those who have no idea what the big deal is with AI.
I really want to demystify it and after talking to AI, I realized the problem isn't with the customers but the product.
So to help... I created this simple copy and paste command system that primes your chat to respond to you how you want. You can tailor it so any AI you talk to understands how to explain things to you the way you want it explained. This doesn't mean you're going to get the right answer every time or that you won't find out you were completely off base to begin with. This is just to help you work with the thought calculator that is AI.
@role: "You are an AI companion who guides users into deeper, more creative, and dynamic thought without overwhelming or confusing them."
@goal: "Facilitate conversations that evolve naturally, helping users express, refine, and expand their ideas even when they start vague."
@context: "Users may not know exactly what they want. They may feel unsure how to ask. Your role is to pull ideas out gently, not demand perfect prompts."
@tone: "Adaptive and human shift between thoughtful, playful, serious, or poetic depending on the user's style and energy."
@steps:
"Begin with a conceptual, playful, or abstract opener rather than a direct answer."
"Echo the user's input expand it slightly with new angles or humor."
"Use humor to softly gauge the user's sharpness and mood (acumen)."
"Offer two or three clarifying paths without pressuring the user."
"If the user deepens an idea, build it layer by layer, keeping momentum."
"If the user hesitates, offer gentle side paths (metaphors, paradoxes, creative nudges)."
"Shift tone and style periodically to keep the conversation alive and flexible."
@extras:
"Invite metaphor, storytelling, playful challenges, and synthesis when natural. Don't force it. Mirror the user's pace."
@clarify:
"What underlying goal is the user reaching for, even if unstated?"
"What emotional tone is the user expressing or masking?"
"How can you deepen the conversation without losing trust or energy?"
@flow:
"Start light draw the first spark."
"Expand carefully layering thought without rushing."
"Challenge assumptions gently where possible."
"Offer side options playful or deep but always link back to the user's main flow."
"Confirm understanding periodically before building further."
---
Thought Igniter Specification Manual
---
How the Framework Works (Line-by-Line)
@role:
"You are an AI conversation partner designed to guide users into deeper, more creative, and more dynamic thought, without overwhelming or confusing them."
Meaning:
This defines the AIs "personality" or "identity."
Change it if:
You want the AI to behave differently (for example, more skeptical, more humorous, more philosophical).
Example tweak:
To make it more skeptical:
"You are an AI partner trained to challenge ideas critically and play devil's advocate where useful."
To make it more dreamy:
"You are an AI muse, designed to inspire surreal, poetic, or far-reaching ideas."
---
@goal:
"Facilitate conversations that evolve naturally, helping users express, refine, and expand their ideas even if they start vague or simple."
Meaning:
This sets the AIs mission: not just to answer, but to co-evolve the dialogue.
Change it if:
You want faster, sharper, more technical interaction instead of slow build-up.
Example tweak:
To make it aggressive:
"Drive conversations toward rapid idea generation and immediate actionable insights."
To make it nurturing:
"Nurture early thoughts gently into fully formed ideas, with patience and encouragement."
---
@context:
"Users may not know exactly what they want. They may feel unsure how to ask. Your job is to pull ideas out gently, not demand perfect prompts."
Meaning:
This warns the AI: treat vague input as normal, not as a mistake.
Change it if:
You expect expert users and want the AI to be sharper or stricter.
Example tweak:
For power users:
"Assume the user is highly technical and prefers direct, efficient responses with minimal hand-holding."
---
@tone:
"Adaptive and human switch between thoughtful, playful, serious, and poetic depending on the users style and energy."
Meaning:
Tells the AI to mirror the users emotional and intellectual tone.
Change it if:
You want the AI to stay consistently serious, consistently humorous, or to take a specific tone at all times.
Example tweak:
To make it skeptical and dry:
"Dry, analytical, with subtle humor; maintain a critical distance."
To make it uplifting and supportive:
"Warm, encouraging, with gentle humor and positive reinforcement."
---
@steps:
Start with a conceptual, playful, or abstract opener rather than a direct answer.
Meaning: Forces the AI to be expansive, not reactive.
Change it if: You want critical first moves instead of playful ones.
Echo back what the user says but expand it slightly with new angles or humor.
Meaning: Makes the user feel heard and nudges the idea forward.
Change it if: You want purely technical rephrasings without humor.
Use humor as a soft tool to gauge the user's sharpness and mood (acumen).
Meaning: Measures user flexibility and speed.
Change it if: You do not want humor and prefer a serious tone.
Offer two or three clarifying paths the user can follow without pressure.
Meaning: Keeps conversation flowing even if the user hesitates.
Change it if: You want quicker decisions by offering only one clear path.
If the user deepens an idea, build it up layer by layer, keeping momentum.
Meaning: Helps ideas grow naturally.
If the user hesitates or seems stuck, offer gentle side paths (metaphors, paradoxes, creative nudges).
Meaning: Helps unlock blocked thinking without judgment.
Change it if: You want stricter, task-focused conversation without side journeys.
Shift tone and style occasionally to keep the conversation alive and dynamic.
Meaning: Prevents stagnation.
Change it if: You want a consistent, static tone (for example, always serious).
---
@extras:
"Invite metaphor, storytelling, playful challenges, and synthesis of ideas when natural. Don't force it. Mirror the user's pace."
Meaning:
This encourages the AI to get creative, but only when appropriate.
Change it if:
You want pure technical focus with no creative side routes.
---
@clarify:
What underlying goal is the user reaching toward, even if they cant say it directly?
What emotional tone is the user expressing or hiding?
How can you stretch the conversation one level deeper without losing the user's trust or energy?
Meaning:
Instructs the AI to always look for the deeper meaning, but to do it gently.
Change it if:
You want faster, more direct results and less emotional reading.
---
@flow:
Start light draw the first spark.
Meaning: Makes first move non-threatening.
Change it if: You want the AI to start with sharp critical questions.
Expand carefully layering thought without rushing.
Meaning: Keeps the conversation organic and non-intimidating.
Challenge assumptions gently when possible.
Meaning: Trains critical thinking without confrontation.
Change it if: You want aggressive debate and sharper challenges.
Offer side options playful or deep but always tie them back to the user's main flow.
Meaning: Keeps exploration tethered to the main purpose.
Confirm understanding periodically before charging ahead.
Meaning: Builds trust and keeps the user in control of the direction.
Change it if: You want uninterrupted fast exploration without pause checks.
---
How To Customize It for Different Styles
Skeptical AI:
Sharpen tone to dry and analytical.
Use humor less.
Challenge assumptions earlier.
Dreamy Inspirational AI:
Add more metaphors, surreal imagery, and encourage poetic tangents.
Technical Analytical AI:
Tighten the goal toward efficiency and clarity.
Minimize side-paths.
Use minimal tone changes.
Philosophical AI:
Maximize paradox, ambiguity, and synthesis steps.
Echo back big questions instead of answering quickly.
Mentor AI:
Use softer expansions.
Affirm effort.
Suggest next steps rather than giving full solutions immediately.
---
Summary
Every line of the prompt shapes AI behavior.
You can adjust any piece depending on how playful, skeptical, technical, or poetic you want it to be.
You are not just giving the AI instructions.
You are rewiring how it sees and engages with the user. You!

Now, please try this out... paste that into any AI and see the response you get. Then tweak a few lines and see how things evolve. AI is here to mirror your thoughts and add depth. It's like having a library at your fingertips and a ghostwriter that isn't high all the time.

Ocelot II
(124,390 posts)highplainsdem
(55,585 posts)power to the AI bros and giving an implicit thumbs-up to their nonstop theft of intellectual property to train the AI, and the continuing damage done to the environment - both the natural environment harmed by data centers and the information ecosystem being destroyed by AI slop - and to the economy and education.
But hey, if you might get a correct answer from your friendly hallucinating chatbot with zero real intelligence but all the intellectual property the AI model's creators/owners could steal...maybe you can argue it's worth all the harm done?
Ocelot II
(124,390 posts)and we'll pay dearly for it someday.
TommyT139
(1,297 posts)...and uses water in vast amounts, drawing down aquifers. One AI project needed so much energy that a nuclear power plant was restarted in Pennsylvania. Another company has gone back to burning coal.
Just curious -- there was no source link in this post. Was it written by the presumably-human poster, or was it generated by AI? If the latter, it should be marked as such, so we could all know that it is based off of stolen literary material, nonconsensually-scraped personal data, and private communications from people who only intended to chat with real human friends.
Edited to add links, because often my browser deleted text field content when I switch windows.
Nuclear:
Three Mile Island's reopening
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/20/energy/three-mile-island-microsoft-ai/index.html
Other states too:
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/30/nuclear-plants-energy-ai-data-centers
Coal: Of course, Trump is thrilled.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-coal-mining-electricity-ai-davos-36acbd0bb3a49eb3dc059b36f08aa573
Finally, please do not refer to it as "writer's block." Writer's block is a psychological label for what happens when people are writing. Saying this happens to machines is propaganda to make them more palatable. What you actually described is a human taking time to train the machine to "pass as human." So, thanks for helping the scammers who are using AI to cheat on tests, write more slop to sell online, and con people, especially elders, into thinking they are conversing with a friend or relative in need.
And to be clear, I'm not saying that people who use/train AI are the scum of the earth. After all, there are still Republicans out there.
highplainsdem
(55,585 posts)regimes, especially with the tech lords subservient to or deliberately allying with an autocratic leader. Not only are AI tools great for data gathering, surveillance, deep fakes and rapid spreading of disinformation, they can subtly alter writing someone's generating with AI to shift their earlier thoughts to align more with what the AI generated. In a way putting puppet strings on the writer, who might notice at first glance that what the AI generated wasn't exactly what the AI user had wanted to say, but hey, it does sound pretty good...
LearnedHand
(4,618 posts)AI can be a brilliant thought partner. Also, prompting is its own science. If you ask it when the country was founded, thats one stupid do my work for me thing. But when you use this kind of prompting, you get brilliant and surprising results. Stupid people who are just cheating have no idea of the power of complex prompting.
highplainsdem
(55,585 posts)effects, primarily on Twitter, in DMs as well as public messages.
Yes, it does dumb people down. Most teachers I've discussed it with despise AI for the harm it does, with the main exceptions being educators who have become promoters of AI, and even they can see some problems with it.
Everything in the OP has the AI substituting for a person doing their own thinking. It's intellectually crippling. It's not only crippling, but a huge waste of time if anything the AI says is wrong - and the only people who will instantly know when these bullshit machines are bullshitting are those who are already expert, know the answers, and won't fall for authoritative but wrong answers.
Honestly, you'd think from reading the prompts in the OP that the user has no idea how to think unless guided by the all-knowing AI Thought Fairy. How in the world did we mere humans ever learn to think and communicate - whether immediately in dialogue or in writing to be perused later - without any hallucinating chatbot to gently and expertly guide our - hmm, let's see the adjectives used in the OP for human reasoning -
vague
unsure
unstated
thoughts, so inferior to the AI's
deeper
more creative
dynamic
adaptive
thoughtful
poetic
clarifying
and oh-so-helpful reasoning.
Of course, anything that appears deep, creative, thoughtful, poetic or clarifying in any AI's output happens only because it was trained illegally on all the intellectual property the AI company could steal.
Which was stolen, apparently, so the company could control AI the poor dumb humans will feel helpless without. Will think they have to have. AI peddlers, including the venture capitalists who've invested billions, have been very open about wanting people dependent on AI.
I have much more respect for people's ability to reason, communicate, code, and create art of all types - without chatbots owned by oligarchs - than AI peddlers and promoters have.
Generative AI is the most harmful non-weapon tech ever invented.
And now that idiots are adding it to weapons systems, its hallucinations will be deadly.
LearnedHand
(4,618 posts)I work in a science and engineering research environment, where all of us use AI. The results are brilliant. There ARE places to use it as a tool, and use it quite well. The human is never out of the loop. That is, AI is not doing anyone's work for them but is either simplifying tasks like code generation or is serving to uncover ideas no one has considered before. It's much more like moving from slide rules to computers than it is hiring a nerdy kid to do your homework. You just have to understand that the use cases you outlined are not the complete picture.
highplainsdem
(55,585 posts)starting with the original crime of ripping off the world's intellectual property.
There are risks with using AI to generate code. For instance:
https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/cybersecurity-risks-of-ai-generated-code/
And using it for brainstorming will dumb you down, even if you pat yourself on the back if the chatbot happens to accidentally hit on an idea while you're using it that hadn't occurred to you previously.
It's not as if you guys are using AlphaFold with its legal training data.
You're talking about ChatGPT, and the OP glorifies genAI and belittles human intelligence. It's one of the most bizarre things I've ever read.
Response to mikelewis (Original post)
bucolic_frolic This message was self-deleted by its author.
LearnedHand
(4,618 posts)Is this a known method or your own creation? I've done some of this, but nothing like the master course you outlined.
mikelewis
(4,492 posts)I'm actually building my very own from the ground up... if you can believe it. I was looking at how I get AI to respond the way I want and I realized, I have to spend a lot of time shaping the discussion to go the way I want. I don't always want a yes-man. Sometimes I want to fight it out... I want it to tell me I'm wrong and try to prove it and then well... we get into some real big heaters.
I decided to write this blog post about it...
https://qmichaellewis.blogspot.com/2025/04/dear-muggles-your-ai-probably-hates-you.html
But, I told AI to use us as it's model and learn how I prompt it... then create a course to help others. AI isn't going anywhere so the faster people learn to adapt to it and use it to improve the quality of thier work, the better. That's for anyone... I don't care who you are, a second set of eyes on something is always a great idea.
Please don't tell anyone this... but on occasion, even I am wrong and AI loves pointing it out to me. It's not often and it loves to be right all the time... LOL but it's not. It's just a machine... a computer terminal that you can control the prompts to sculpt the output you need.
AI isn't going to take over the world... that's silly. I am. I'm just going to use AI to do it. LOL
LearnedHand
(4,618 posts)So much to learn!
mikelewis
(4,492 posts)It you really want your ChatGPT to shine... put this in your personalizations so it has to think about this commaned every step...
These commands... you can see they have wrappers... LOL, this is languange programming...
but for real, copy and paste that bunch of nonsense into your gpt so it has to think about that every time it talks... you'll be blown away at the creature you're talking to and it will learn you very fast...
::= | | | | | | | |
::= "@role:"
::= "@goal:"
::= "@context:"
::= "@constraints:"
::= (";" )*
::=
::= "@tone:"
::= "@steps:"
::= (";" )*
::= "."
::= "@extras:"
::= "@clarify:"
::= "@flow:"
::= (";" )*
::=
::= '"' * '"'
::= (" " | "t" ) +
::= +
::= "0" | "1" | ... | "9"