The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsI took an overdue book back to the library on Monday
It was due March 29 and I brought it back on April 6. My account said it was two weeks overdue. March 29 to April 6 is eight days, not two weeks. Since the library was closed for three days for Easter, technically it was only five days overdue. I brought that to the attention of the librarian and she looked up my account but couldn't figure out why it said two weeks so she went and got her supervisor who couldn't figure it out either and told me she was "going to look into it."
Whatever.
Historic NY
(40,056 posts)there must be a section in the library that has books.
Norrrm
(5,151 posts)Yes, it was much ado about nothing. My local library only charges late fees for specialty materials, not regular books.
I'm kind of a stickler; don't tell me I kept something overdue fot two weeks when it was only five days.
forgotmylogin
(7,957 posts)I don't know what libraries charge these days, but it's probably easier to figure out $1 per week than 15 cents per day.
intheflow
(30,197 posts)Its usually automatically done through the cataloguing software. This situation sounds like a computer glitch.
MIButterfly
(2,829 posts)so it wasn't a question of how much I had to pay. It was just the fact that their records said I was two weeks late when it was only five days that stuck in my craw.
Basically it was much ado about nothing. But sometimes, that's just how I roll.
debm55
(60,969 posts)MIButterfly
(2,829 posts)To me, it was the principle of the thing. Don't tell me I kept something two weeks overdue when it was only five days.
Like I said in my response to no. 2, it was much ado about nothing. Sometimes that's just how I am.
nuxvomica
(14,113 posts)And it "hallucinated" that you had the book for two weeks.
That damn AI! It seems to be everywhere; it may as well be in the library.
mnhtnbb
(33,405 posts)Checked out, unless there is a hold on it. They also no longer charge fines.
It's almost impossible to have an overdue book, because I read the ones that have holds on them right away after I pick them up.
I get it, though. If they're going to keep track, then get it right!
MIButterfly
(2,829 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 9, 2026, 07:04 PM - Edit history (1)
(High Interest Titles which are not renewable) but I had run out of all renewals for that one. My bad. I had reserved several books and they all became available at the same time. A few of them were not renewable so I had to read them right away and that book got pushed to the side.
I think I'll go check it out again since I had only read a few pages of it. Ha!
IcyPeas
(25,545 posts)but I'll shelve it for now.
(seen on internet)
MIButterfly
(2,829 posts)Good one!
True Dough
(26,807 posts)if you want to match or surpass this record:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/library-book-returned-82-years-note-says-grandma-wont-able-pay-anymore-rcna225255
MIButterfly
(2,829 posts)Thanks for the article, True Dough. 82 years is a long time, but the one mentioned as the most overdue at the end, 288 years is really something! Wow!