Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,824 posts)
Mon Feb 9, 2026, 05:35 PM 3 hrs ago

Actually, the Washington Post Layoffs Were a Bigger Bloodbath Than You Thought

News & Politics

Actually, the Washington Post Layoffs Were a Bigger Bloodbath Than You Thought

Nearly half of the paper's newsroom was eliminated during last week's cuts—possibly the largest one-day wipeout of journalists in a generation.

Written by Paul Farhi | Published on February 9, 2026


Photograph by Daniella Byck.

The layoffs announced last week at the Washington Post were disfiguring to the esteemed news organization, with whole sections and departments—sports, books, staff photography—wiped away, and devastating cuts inflicted on its Metro section and foreign bureaus. But the extent of the damage is actually greater than first reported.

News reports about the layoffs, including this one from the New York Times, generally agreed that about one-third of the Post’s newsroom would be eliminated by the layoffs. However, an accounting by the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, the union that represents Post journalists, finds that the paper’s management eliminated closer to half of the journalists it used to employ.

According to guild steward Sarah Kaplan, a Post Metro reporter, the paper is dropping between 350 and 375 journalists. With the newsroom’s pre-layoff strength at 790 people, that means between 44 percent and 47.5 percent of the newsroom has been axed.

In a dreadful era for journalism jobs, the Post’s bloodbath stands out: last week may have been the biggest one-day wipeout of journalists in a generation.

{snip}
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Actually, the Washington Post Layoffs Were a Bigger Bloodbath Than You Thought (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 3 hrs ago OP
Horrifying Easterncedar 2 hrs ago #1
Should have gone the NY Post route and sucked Trump's , well never mind. dem4decades 2 hrs ago #2
I have taken the WaPo for over 30 years. oberle 2 hrs ago #3

oberle

(309 posts)
3. I have taken the WaPo for over 30 years.
Mon Feb 9, 2026, 06:14 PM
2 hrs ago

I liked the online version, but got the Sunday paper so I'd have something to put under the litter box. I care a lot about what happens in the DMV. And I refuse to watch local news on tv. No more. Now I have the Sunday NYT to put under the litter box. I really don't care what's happening in NYC, but there's no alternative.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»District of Columbia»Actually, the Washington ...