Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Georgia
Related: About this forumGeorgia insists server deletion was not undertaken to delete evidence
Georgia insists server deletion was not undertaken to delete evidence"Narrative asserted in the media that the data was nefariously deleted is without merit."
CYRUS FARIVAR - Ars Technica 11/1/2017, 4:12 PM
Georgia state officials said Monday that the recent reports of server deletion "were not undertaken to delete evidence." The conclusion came as part of a two-page "investigation report" authored by Ryan Germany of the Georgia Secretary of States office.
As Ars reported last week, a university server and its backups, believed to be key to a pending federal lawsuit filed against Georgia election officials, were deleted, according to e-mails recently released under a public records request.
Also this week, the states Office of the Attorney General (OAG) told plaintiffs that it would no longer be representing state election officials. The lawsuit will now be taken over by Barnes Law Group, headed by former Georgia Governor Ray Barnes.
Georgia previously came under heavy scrutiny after a researcher discovered significant problems with his home states voting system. A lawsuit soon followed in state court, asking the court to annul the results of the June 20 special election for Congress and to prevent Georgias existing computer-based voting system from being used again. The case, Curling v. Kemp, was filed in Fulton County Superior Court on July 3 but has since been moved to federal court.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/georgia-insists-server-deletion-was-not-undertaken-to-delete-evidence/
					
						5 replies
						
							 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
				 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
						Georgia insists server deletion was not undertaken to delete evidence (Original Post)
						workinclasszero
						Nov 2017
						OP
					
      
      
      
        
        But republican run Georgia investigated itself and found itself innocent
        workinclasszero
        Nov 2017
        #3
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
DK504
(3,847 posts)1. They failed to preserve evidence that shows collusion of state employees.
        They didn't back up ANY information? If there is a decent federal judge on the bench he needs to throw the book at these criminals and set a precedence.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)3. But republican run Georgia investigated itself and found itself innocent
        So there!  
 
DetlefK
(16,670 posts)5. The back-ups were wiped, too. The FBI maybe has some back-ups as well. Maybe.
        lapfog_1
(31,366 posts)2. amazingly we have video of them erasing the server
        DetlefK
(16,670 posts)4. It is "standard IT-procedure" to wipe everything, including the back-ups????
        I know for a fact that it is an actual standard IT-procedure to make 3 separate back-ups: on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. 
-> So when the server goes haywire, you have the choice to restore it to "the data we had yesterday", "the data we had last week" or "the data we had last month".

