Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

We\'re not
going back!

(=^.^=)

~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
FUCK
DONALD
TRUMP

(=^.^=)
~~~~~~~~
3.1415926535
897932384626
433832795028
841971693993
751058209749
445923078164
062862089986
$ $ $
MONEY
DOES NOT
EQUAL
SPEECH
$ $ $
*****
THE BEST
DEMOCRACY
MONEY CAN
BUY!!
*****
We\'re #1

Who knew?
So many
good Germans
in our party
:-(
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

TexasTowelie

(122,515 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 08:24 AM Feb 2017

Why is it unreasonable for Cargill to take responsibility for its own sludge?

Reader Blake Scheidegger responds to America's biggest private company comes begging for Minnesota's help:

Hmmm, permitting process sped up? Good.

Dredging and putting the sludge wherever it's the least expensive to dump it for the company? Umm, no.

It's pretty reasonable to ask that it's taken care of properly. Why would they possibly not be responsible for that? Sounds like they're already putting sludge in an appropriate place, so it doesn't seem so crazy to ask they do the same with some new sludge.

Weep for the ultra-rich and their tax bracket that really isn't much higher than my broke-ass tax bracket? Umm, no. Not mad they're rich, but definitely not feeling sorry for them.

Read more: http://www.citypages.com/news/why-is-it-unreasonable-for-cargill-to-take-responsibility-for-its-own-sludge/413200173

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»Why is it unreasonable fo...