Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(129,764 posts)
Wed Oct 1, 2025, 09:37 PM Oct 1

Jack Ciattarelli Campaigned on Ending Pensions, Healthcare for Retirees

When Jack Ciattarelli first announced his bid for New Jersey governor in October 2016, he made public worker benefits reform a centerpiece of his platform. In his launch speech, Ciattarelli outlined proposals that would have sharply reduced retirement security for public worker

He called for eliminating post-retirement health coverage for anyone whose pension and Social Security income exceeded $50,000 annually, effectively stripping many middle-class retirees of the health plans they relied on — and potentially the doctors tied to those plans.

Ciattarelli also proposed phasing out the state’s traditional pension system by shifting all new hires and employees with less than ten years of service into 401(k)-style defined contribution accounts. At the same time, he vowed to end so-called “Cadillac” health insurance plans, echoing language from the Affordable Care Act.

Ciattarelli's proposals would have been sweeping, negatively impacting workers counting on pensions. The Republican candidate proposed switching workers to riskier retirement accounts, and retirees who had earned benefits through decades of service could be denied health coverage outright.

https://meidasnews.com/news/jack-ciattarelli-campaigned-on-ending-pensions-healthcare-for-retirees

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Ciattarelli Campaigned on Ending Pensions, Healthcare for Retirees (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 1 OP
The NJ Supreme Court ruled (2010?) that pensioner"s health care, as it was funded at that time, could not be 3Hotdogs Oct 1 #1
My mother would have endorsed Ciatarelli. Fifty years ago, she was a trustee on no_hypocrisy Oct 2 #2

3Hotdogs

(14,678 posts)
1. The NJ Supreme Court ruled (2010?) that pensioner"s health care, as it was funded at that time, could not be
Wed Oct 1, 2025, 11:28 PM
Oct 1

reduced or eliminated for persons already retired. Also, those existing pensions could not be reduced for people already retired.

Eliminating Cost of living adjustments was allowed under the ruling.

Public employees that retired after Chris (piece of shit) Christie's directive could receive lower health care funding from the state.

I retired in 2006. I'm grateful that my Medicare is fully paid for by the state pension fund. But I have not had a C.O.L.A. increase in 16 years. My pension continues to decline in value, every year.


Maggots complain about paying for our pensions. The problem is, as a state employee, I/we had no choice but to put out retirement savings into the state plan. If I had the opportunity to invest my money in an IRA, I would have been better off today.

no_hypocrisy

(53,408 posts)
2. My mother would have endorsed Ciatarelli. Fifty years ago, she was a trustee on
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 04:49 AM
Oct 2

our town's Board of Education. And she incensed that tax dollars had to fund the medical and dental of retired teachers.

What got me was that she was a former teacher and that she was comfortably married to a doctor and didn't have to be concerned/worried about how to pay for the infirmities that come with being over 65.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»Jack Ciattarelli Campaign...