Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(78,712 posts)
Mon Oct 20, 2025, 08:40 PM Monday

Pennsylvania Supreme Court would be left short-handed if retention effort fails

For all the political debate about whether or not to retain state Supreme Court justices Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty or David Wecht this fall, one question rarely gets discussed: If voters decide to send them home on Nov. 4 … what happens next?

For Chip Becker, an appellate lawyer who vice-chairs the state Supreme Court Commission on Judicial Independence, the answer could be “disarray.”

Multiple long-term vacancies on the seven-member court would be a “significant blow to the efficiency and speed at which the court could function,” Becker said.

Pennsylvania’s constitution lays out a clear procedure for filling a Supreme Court vacancy. If the justices close out their term at the end of the year, the governor can nominate an interim replacement until the next municipal election, which would be in 2027. But the Senate must confirm that nomination by a two-thirds majority.


https://www.wesa.fm/politics-government/2025-10-20/pa-supreme-court-wecht-retention

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Pennsylvania Supreme Cour...