Washington

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(130,849 posts) Sat Oct 25, 2025, 02:43 AM Oct 25

Masked men with cameras provoking people in Spanaway

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Masked men with cameras provoking people in Spanaway (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 25 OP

This needs to be fully investigated as to whether they are part of an organized group communicaating hlthe2b Oct 25 #1

New term--"escalation impresario." There are other, less polite names. Timeflyer Oct 25 #2

yikes...i have family living there im gonna call them.. samnsara Oct 25 #3

Sociopathy masquerading as journalism fpublic Oct 25 #4

hlthe2b

(112,088 posts)

1. This needs to be fully investigated as to whether they are part of an organized group communicaating

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Oct 25, 2025, 03:22 AM

Oct 25

on the internet/social media, or the dark web. I have a hunch as to what they are trying to do, but it needs to be thoroughly investigated. What damned creeps. Just an extension of ICE Tactics and may well be an attempt to perversely counter the protests against the former.

Timeflyer

(3,522 posts)

2. New term--"escalation impresario." There are other, less polite names.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Oct 25, 2025, 08:15 AM

Oct 25

samnsara

(18,680 posts)

3. yikes...i have family living there im gonna call them..

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Oct 25, 2025, 08:42 AM

Oct 25

fpublic

(64 posts)

4. Sociopathy masquerading as journalism

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Oct 25, 2025, 12:46 PM

Oct 25

Only thing new about this is tv news is covering it (which is a good thing). It is a very well established movement of sociopath activists looking to profit off of offensive confrontations on Youtube.
They masquerade as "first amendment auditors". They claim to be stress-testing the first amendment but are simply emotionally abusing the public for profit.
Search for "frauditor" to see how big a problem this has become.
Their achilles heel is that YouTube requires a permission/release from people that are identifiable in videos. They lose the ability to profit if these complaints are verified by YouTube. Their bad faith dedication to "free speech" will become obvious. If they can't monetize the video, they will go away.

Reply to this discussion