Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,422 posts)
Tue Apr 28, 2026, 06:46 PM Tuesday

Judge temporarily blocks Wyoming's newest abortion ban

Wyoming
Judge temporarily blocks Wyoming’s newest abortion ban

The law, which prohibits abortion in all but the earliest days of pregnancy, is now on hold while a lawsuit proceeds.

by Wyofile
yesterday

https://i0.wp.com/oilcity.news/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/DSC05380-1200x800-1.webp
People gather in Cheyenne to protest the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade and with it the constitutional right to abortion. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

by Maggie Mullen, WyoFile

Natrona County District Judge Dan Forgey on Friday temporarily halted enforcement of Wyoming’s newest anti-abortion law while a legal challenge against it proceeds. ... The law in question, which was passed by the Wyoming Legislature during the 2026 session and took effect in March, bans abortion in all but the earliest days of pregnancy. More specifically, the “heartbeat” law makes abortion illegal beyond approximately the sixth week of pregnancy, when it’s first possible to detect fetal cardiac activity.

The plaintiffs in the case, which include the few providers who perform abortions in Wyoming, argue the law is unconstitutional due to language in the state constitution that protects an individual’s right to make their own health care decisions. ... Those protections were also the basis for the Wyoming Supreme Court’s January decision to strike down two previous abortion bans.

Wyoming Attorney General Keith Kautz argued at a Wednesday hearing that the new law fits within the bounds of the Wyoming Constitution and the high court’s decision. He also pushed back on the plaintiffs’ argument that the law was too ambiguous and that detection of a heartbeat was an arbitrary point to enforce restrictions. ... The plaintiffs, however, “made a sufficient showing of irreparable injury,” Judge Forgey wrote in his Friday decision temporarily halting the law’s enforcement. ... “The state defendants did not persuasively argue otherwise,” he wrote.

Forgey also pointed to the high court’s January ruling, known as the Johnson case. ... “The plaintiffs have on this record made a sufficient showing of probable success that justifies their request for temporary injunctive relief, particularly when the statues at issue are evaluated and considered according to Article 1, [Section] 38 of the Wyoming Constitution, and how the Wyoming Supreme Court applied it in Johnson.”

This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

This article was originally published by WyoFile and is republished here with permission. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wyoming»Judge temporarily blocks ...