Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,753 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 11:52 AM 4 hrs ago

NYT Opinion Round Table: What if Labor Becomes Unnecessary?

Opinion
Round Table

What if Labor Becomes Unnecessary?

Feb. 4, 2026


A collage featuring images of a construction crane and a factory floor.
Illustration by The New York Times


By David Autor, Anton Korinek and Natasha Sarin

David Autor is a professor at M.I.T. Anton Korinek is a professor at the University of Virginia. Natasha Sarin is the president of the Budget Lab at Yale.

David Leonhardt, an Opinion editorial director, hosted an online conversation with three economists about the effects that artificial intelligence is — or isn’t — already having on employment and about how big a transition society is facing.

David Leonhardt: Before we look toward the future, let’s talk about the present. I know there is debate among economists about whether A.I. has already led to a meaningful amount of job loss. What do you each think?

David Autor: The evidence is inconclusive. The most widely discussed findings document a slower pace of hiring of young workers in occupations that seem exposed to A.I., such as computer programming and customer support. But the hiring downturn starts in the spring of 2022, before the release of ChatGPT in November of 2022. The timing is a puzzle.

Something that did occur simultaneously with the downturn is a sharp rise in the Federal Reserve’s fund rates. This is a plausible explanation for the slowdown. Other recent economic turbulence — including tariffs — may also play a role. Indeed, hiring in these same A.I.-exposed occupations has been sensitive to business cycles and interest rates going back well before the current A.I. era. A.I. may play a role in the recent hiring trends, but it’s quite possible that it does not.

{snip}

David Autor is a professor of economics at M.I.T. and a faculty co-director of the Stone Center on Inequality and Shaping the Future of Work.

Anton Korinek is a professor of economics at the University of Virginia and faculty director of the Economics of Transformative AI Initiative.

Natasha Sarin is a professor at Yale Law School, a co-founder of the Budget Lab at Yale and a former Treasury Department official.

Source photographs by KIM JAE-HWAN and AFP via Getty Images.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Opinion Round Table: What if Labor Becomes Unnecessary? (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 4 hrs ago OP
I'd like to see AI come fix my burst water pipes Wicked Blue 4 hrs ago #1
Labor is always necessary. markodochartaigh 4 hrs ago #2
my life would be poor without work rampartd 3 hrs ago #4
We've been through this many times before. PoindexterOglethorpe 3 hrs ago #3

Wicked Blue

(8,664 posts)
1. I'd like to see AI come fix my burst water pipes
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 12:04 PM
4 hrs ago

For that matter, who's going to maintain and repair the data centers and computers and communication systems upon which AI depends? Who's going to maintain the roads and utility lines serving these data centers? Who is going to run and maintain the power plants that support the energy demands of AI?

Kurt Vonnegut in 1952 wrote a remarkably prescient novel about a society in which a handful of individuals with multiple PhDs control the operations of society, while nearly all the rest of the population is unemployed or works at menial jobs like sweeping streets and picking up trash. It's called Player Piano, and is well worth reading.

markodochartaigh

(5,207 posts)
2. Labor is always necessary.
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 12:05 PM
4 hrs ago

Not because the labor of the workers produces profits which can further enrich the rich, but because the labor of the workers produces a sense of satisfaction for the workers ourselves.
Whether the labor is laying bricks, instructing students, or studying all labor has value in itself.
Take away labor from the life of a person and you get the meaningless existence of the morbidly rich whose only purpose is to consume the excess production of society like a parasite.

rampartd

(4,148 posts)
4. my life would be poor without work
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 01:14 PM
3 hrs ago

but, in the end, without a steady pay check i'd be hungry and homeless.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,485 posts)
3. We've been through this many times before.
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 01:06 PM
3 hrs ago

I recall a recession in the 1950s when it was being claimed that all work was going to be automated, done by robots. Well, all the jobs didn't go away then, and they won't go away now.

Some jobs do disappear entirely. Probably not too many buggy-whip makers these days. But the unemployment rate is all of 4.4%, which means almost everyone can get a job.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»NYT Opinion Round Table: ...