Economy
Related: About this forumNYT Opinion Round Table: What if Labor Becomes Unnecessary?
Round Table
What if Labor Becomes Unnecessary?
Feb. 4, 2026

A collage featuring images of a construction crane and a factory floor.
Illustration by The New York Times
By David Autor, Anton Korinek and Natasha Sarin
David Autor is a professor at M.I.T. Anton Korinek is a professor at the University of Virginia. Natasha Sarin is the president of the Budget Lab at Yale.
David Leonhardt, an Opinion editorial director, hosted an online conversation with three economists about the effects that artificial intelligence is or isnt already having on employment and about how big a transition society is facing.
David Leonhardt: Before we look toward the future, lets talk about the present. I know there is debate among economists about whether A.I. has already led to a meaningful amount of job loss. What do you each think?
David Autor: The evidence is inconclusive. The most widely discussed findings document a slower pace of hiring of young workers in occupations that seem exposed to A.I., such as computer programming and customer support. But the hiring downturn starts in the spring of 2022, before the release of ChatGPT in November of 2022. The timing is a puzzle.
Something that did occur simultaneously with the downturn is a sharp rise in the Federal Reserves fund rates. This is a plausible explanation for the slowdown. Other recent economic turbulence including tariffs may also play a role. Indeed, hiring in these same A.I.-exposed occupations has been sensitive to business cycles and interest rates going back well before the current A.I. era. A.I. may play a role in the recent hiring trends, but its quite possible that it does not.
{snip}
David Autor is a professor of economics at M.I.T. and a faculty co-director of the Stone Center on Inequality and Shaping the Future of Work.
Anton Korinek is a professor of economics at the University of Virginia and faculty director of the Economics of Transformative AI Initiative.
Natasha Sarin is a professor at Yale Law School, a co-founder of the Budget Lab at Yale and a former Treasury Department official.
Source photographs by KIM JAE-HWAN and AFP via Getty Images.
Wicked Blue
(8,664 posts)For that matter, who's going to maintain and repair the data centers and computers and communication systems upon which AI depends? Who's going to maintain the roads and utility lines serving these data centers? Who is going to run and maintain the power plants that support the energy demands of AI?
Kurt Vonnegut in 1952 wrote a remarkably prescient novel about a society in which a handful of individuals with multiple PhDs control the operations of society, while nearly all the rest of the population is unemployed or works at menial jobs like sweeping streets and picking up trash. It's called Player Piano, and is well worth reading.
markodochartaigh
(5,207 posts)Not because the labor of the workers produces profits which can further enrich the rich, but because the labor of the workers produces a sense of satisfaction for the workers ourselves.
Whether the labor is laying bricks, instructing students, or studying all labor has value in itself.
Take away labor from the life of a person and you get the meaningless existence of the morbidly rich whose only purpose is to consume the excess production of society like a parasite.
rampartd
(4,148 posts)but, in the end, without a steady pay check i'd be hungry and homeless.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,485 posts)I recall a recession in the 1950s when it was being claimed that all work was going to be automated, done by robots. Well, all the jobs didn't go away then, and they won't go away now.
Some jobs do disappear entirely. Probably not too many buggy-whip makers these days. But the unemployment rate is all of 4.4%, which means almost everyone can get a job.