A note on the scale of CO2 emissions connected with steel manufacture.
      
      Here's a brief note from this paper:  Thermal Kinetics and Nitriding Effect of Ammonia-Based Direct Reduction of Iron Oxides  Matic Jovičević-Klug, Yan Ma, Patricia Jovičević-Klug, J. Manoj Prabhakar, Michael Rohwerder, and Dierk Raabe ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2024 12 (26), 9882-9896.
The global steel industry is facing significant changes to improve its sustainability by cutting the use of fossil carbon-based processes, an unavoidable step to arrive at a lower carbon footprint of this sector. (1,2) Currently, steel production contributes a whopping 3.73 billion tonnes of CO2 per year (3) due to the high global demand of nearly 2 billion tonnes per year since 2021. (4) Additionally, the steel market is annually increasing by about 34% (4) translating to a commensurate increase of CO2 emissions, if sustainable changes are not implemented. Conventional steel production pathways utilize fossil carbon in the form of coal, coke, and/or methane-based gas mixtures, which is mixed with the iron oxides and heated to a high temperature in either a blast furnace or a shaft furnace. The carbon reacts with the oxide to form CO (Fe2O3 + 3C → 2Fe + 3CO) and CO2 (Fe2O3 + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO2), resulting in the reduction of iron oxide to an iron-rich product. A large portion of the CO2 emissions (about 79% (3,5)) from the steel industry originate from the initial conversion of iron ores (mainly hematite, Fe2O3) to iron via the blast furnace and basic oxygen furnace route.
Reference 3 is this one:  
World Steel 
Nice pictures of steel columns supporting steel nacelles on wind turbines can be found there.
Ammonia is made from hydrogen overwhelmingly (greater than 98%) using the Haber-Bosch process; electrolysis is at best, a minor contributor.    Despite a huge amount of bullshit to the contrary - wishful thinking that to my mind is exactly equivalent to climate denial because the effect is the same - hydrogen is made overwhelmingly from the steam reformation of dangerous fossil fuels.
Almost no hydrogen is made from electricity generated by the useless wind industry.
So is the reduction of iron ore by ammonia "green?"
I submit it's a 3 card monte game.
It's not necessary to actually develop a sustainable process in this age of the dominance of lying.   It is only necessary to point to one that 
could exist in dreamy theory.   Reality doesn't matter anymore.
Have a nice afternoon.