Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumAmong SpaceX IPO Details: Company Spent $131 Million On Cybertrucks In 2025; Grok Potentially Dangerous; More
EDIT
Scattered throughout the 300-plus-page prospectus are several disclosures and risk warnings that show the eccentricities of Musks company and its cosmic ambitions. Other financial details in the document highlight how interdependent Musks various businesses have become and the risks that they carry. As SpaceX barrels towards the largest initial public offering (IPO) in the history of the US stock market, here is a look at some of the strange details buried within its filing.
SpaceX appears to have done extensive business with Tesla, spending hundreds of millions of dollars with Musks electric car company in recent years. Although much of that money $506m to Tesla in 2025 and $191m in 2024 went to purchasing Teslas Megapack battery product, SpaceX also spent lavishly on Cybertrucks. The prospectus discloses that in 2025 SpaceX obtained $131m worth of Cybertrucks at the manufacturers suggested retail price, which ranges between about $69,900 and $99,900, depending on the options. At that price, SpaceX would have acquired at least 1,300 vehicles.
EDIT
At one point, the prospectus includes what appears to be an AI-generated rendering of life on Mars. The image shows a family on Mars looking out at a rocket launch amid a field of geodesic domes and rows of solar panels.The sci-fi rhetoric is not theoretical; it bears financial stakes. Musk will receive an award of 1bn shares in the company if SpaceX achieves the establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at least 1 million inhabitants. The interplanetary ambitions of SpaceXs central mission also result in some warnings to investors. Reaching such unusual business goals as understanding the true nature of the universe may prove difficult, the company advises.
EDIT
While outlining risk factors, SpaceX includes several large caveats surrounding its products and plans. The company disclosed that its massive amounts of spending have resulted in huge losses, including $4.9bn in 2025 and $4.3bn in the first quarter of this year alone. Such disclosures accounting for potential future risks and the uncertainty of guaranteed revenue are standard in IPO filings. We have a history of net losses and may not achieve profitability in the future, the prospectus states.
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/22/spacex-ipo-filing-details
genxlib
(6,163 posts)This is supposed to convince people to invest?
Continuing losses with no projection of profitability? Questionable self-dealing expenditures? Money pit ego driven adventures?
No thanks
hatrack
(65,162 posts)Therefore, this IPO, isn't really something that needs to happ-
Oh, wait . . .
lostincalifornia
(5,547 posts)musk is behind it.
highplainsdem
(63,118 posts)https://defector.com/neither-elon-musk-nor-anybody-else-will-ever-colonize-mars
OK, so you still want to talk about Mars. Fine. Let's imagine that Mars's lack of a magnetic field somehow is not an issue. Would you like to try to simulate what life on Mars would be like? Step one is to clear out your freezer. Step two is to lock yourself inside of it. (You can bring your phone, if you like!) When you get desperately hungry, your loved ones on the outside may deliver some food to you no sooner than nine months after you ask for it. This nine-month wait will also apply when you start banging on the inside of the freezer, begging to be let out.
-snip-
Life on earth writ large, the grand network of life, is a greater and more dynamic terraforming engine than any person could ever conceive. It has been operating ceaselessly for several billions of years. It has not yet terraformed the South Pole or the summit of Mount Everest. On what type of timeframe were you imagining that the shoebox of lichen you send to Mars was going to transform Frozen Airless Radioactive Desert Hell into a place where people could grow wheat?
People have this idea that life is like some kind of magical force; that the reason Mars does not have life is that life has not yet gone there; that once life goes to a place, then it just figures out how to go on living there. This, I think, is a consequence of more people having gotten their science education from the movie character Ian Malcolm than from actual science classes. More generously, it is a testament to humans having formulated nearly all of their ideas about the nature of life from the absolute easiest (and only known) place to have life.
-snip-
Much, much more at the link.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.