Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(66,989 posts)
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 07:31 PM Thursday

Cost nearly triples to build train between LA, Las Vegas

TRAVEL
Cost nearly triples to build train between LA, Las Vegas

By Olivia Harden, Travel Reporter
Oct 2, 2025


Brightline West was previously expected to be operational by 2027 but has been pushed back to 2029 amid rising costs.
Courtesy of Brightline

The planned high-speed rail from California to Las Vegas has a much heftier price tag than originally expected.

The company that owns the Brightline West project, which plans to build a nearly 220-mile rail line connecting Las Vegas and Rancho Cucamonga, has recently revealed that the cost is almost three times higher than initially projected. The project was initially expected to cost $8 billion, and more recently, the number grew to $16 billion. As first reported by Bloomberg, a report from the Transportation Department released Wednesday estimated that the cost of building Brightline West is now $21.5 billion.

DesertXpress Enterprises, which operates as Brightline West, planned to keep costs down by starting the rail line in Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 40 miles east of Los Angeles, thereby prompting travelers to use the existing Metrolink line from Union Station in Downtown LA. The company is also building the high-speed rail in the median of Interstate 15 to reduce costs associated with land acquisition. However, these cost-cutting measures were not enough to keep the project on budget.
Brightline West told Bloomberg that the company attributes rising price to increasing labor and material costs. In response, the company revised its financial plan by applying for a $6 billion loan from the Trump administration, which was initially intended to be secured through a bank facility.

{snip}

Olivia Harden is a travel reporter at SFGATE, where she has written and reported stories in destinations across the state since 2023. She was born and raised and refuses to leave Southern California. Olivia graduated from Chapman University with a B.A. in English and journalism and has since been featured in Buzzfeed, Mic and more. Her previous role was as a staff writer at Matador Network, a leading travel publication.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

msongs

(72,614 posts)
1. lol high speed rail thru cajon pass. yeah right. let's hope this mob is not getting any taxpayer funding nt
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 07:33 PM
Thursday

House of Roberts

(6,265 posts)
2. Seems like for a hundred million dollars you could build more than a mile of track.
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 07:50 PM
Thursday

Or does the $21.5b include the rolling stock?

Bobstandard

(2,035 posts)
4. Meanwhile China has built 25,000 miles in 10 years
Thu Oct 2, 2025, 09:13 PM
Thursday

We got to the moon in 10 years. We can do this no matter what the nimby/it-wont-benefit-me-personally people say.

MichMan

(16,047 posts)
5. So, your position is that it should just be built regardless of cost
Fri Oct 3, 2025, 02:38 PM
Friday

$16 billion, $50 billion $100 billion? Doesn't matter ?

Where is the money supposed to come from?

Bobstandard

(2,035 posts)
6. Same place the money for the interstate highway system came from
Fri Oct 3, 2025, 07:40 PM
Friday

Or the moon program. Or an aircraft carrier. Or a marginal tax rate of 90% for the top 2% of earners like in the 50s. Just because you don’t want to help pay doesn’t mean we can’t have nice things.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»Cost nearly triples to bu...