Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumFSB's Dire Warning to Putin: "China to Claim Russia's Siberia as Their Own". - The Russian Dude
Russias so-called partnership with China may be turning into one of the biggest strategic betrayals in modern Russian history, because this text argues that Beijing is not rescuing Moscow as an equal ally, but quietly using Russias war-driven weakness to lock in deeper control over its resources, exports, trade routes, and long-term future.
The core message is that Putins confrontation with the West did not make Russia more sovereign, but more desperate, and desperation destroys bargaining power. Instead of standing shoulder to shoulder with China as an equal great power, Russia is increasingly forced to sell oil, gas, gold, raw materials, and strategic access on terms that heavily favor Beijing, while accepting painful discounts on exports and deeper reliance on Chinese goods, electronics, technology, and the yuan. According to the text, this is not a friendship built on trust or ideology, but a relationship built on Chinese patience and Russian weakness. Beijing does not need Russia to collapse, but it also does not need Russia to fully recover. It benefits most from a long, grinding situation where Moscow stays sanctioned, dependent, isolated, and unable to escape the orbit of Chinese trade and finance. That is why the description frames Chinas role as a drip feed strategy: give Russia enough to survive, enough to keep the war going, enough to remain useful, but never enough to become truly independent again.
The most important long-term warning in the text is about Siberia and the Russian Far East, where low population density, huge natural resources, and a long border with China create a slow-moving strategic danger. The argument is not that China will suddenly annex Siberia tomorrow, but that influence can grow through resource contracts, trade dependence, local business expansion, currency usage, infrastructure, labor arrangements, and long-term leverage until formal annexation is no longer even necessary. In that sense, the grand betrayal is not one dramatic event, but a process in which Russia, weakened by the Ukraine war and trapped by Putins short-term survival politics, becomes less like an independent power and more like Chinas discounted resource base, fuel station, and geopolitical asset.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FSB's Dire Warning to Putin: "China to Claim Russia's Siberia as Their Own". - The Russian Dude (Original Post)
2naSalit
9 hrs ago
OP
mitch96
(15,886 posts)1. Countries don't have friends or allies. They have interests...
ruzzia took lots of territory from China in the past when China was weak..
Soon they will want it back.. Lots of oil and water in eastern ruzzia...
m
Ray Bruns
(6,806 posts)2. It's almost as if starting a war of aggression is not worth the cost.
Who knew?