LGBT
Related: About this forumSupreme Court declines to hear case on constitutionality of same-sex marriage" https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/supr
Cross post from GD
Source-https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-case-on-constitutionality-of-same-sex-marriage/
-"The Supreme Court on Monday morning turned down a request from Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky, to reconsider its 2015 decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. In a brief, unsigned order, the justices rejected Davis petition for review of a ruling by a federal appeals court upholding an award of $100,000 to a gay couple to whom she had refused to issue a marriage license. That petition had also asked the justices to overrule the 2015 decision, Obergefell v. Hodges, arguing that a right to same-sex marriage had no basis in the Constitution.
As is generally the case when it denies petitions for review, the court did not provide any explanation for its decision not to hear Davis case. If any justices disagreed with the decision not to take up the case, they did not note that disagreement publicly.
The dispute began more than a decade ago, when in the wake of the courts decision in Obergefell Davis, whose job description included issuing licenses, refused to issue a marriage license to a gay couple, David Moore and David Ermold. Davis then decided to stop issuing marriage licenses to any couple, gay or straight. This included Moore and Ermold, whom she told that she was acting under Gods authority and that they could get a marriage license in a different county.
Two different lawsuits followed: one by Moore and Ermold, who contended that she had violated their constitutional right to marry; and one challenging her refusal to issue any marriage licenses. In the latter case, U.S. District Judge David Bunning ordered Davis to issue licenses to both gay and straight couples. That prompted Moore and Ermold to try once again to obtain a license, but Davis and her deputies rejected that request, as well. Kentucky eventually enacted a law that would accommodate county clerks like Davis by removing their names and signatures from the forms used for marriage licenses."
More there.
The RW lawyers are looking for a better case for them in my opinion.
JPK
(884 posts)The word marriage appears no where in the US Constitution. Either between a male and a female or any other combination of gender.
Norrrm
(3,398 posts)The sanctity of Holy matrimony for conservative Christians - Kim Davis

LetMyPeopleVote
(172,486 posts)The county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples had filed a long-shot petition to the justices.
Hallelujah!!!
— Stephen Trumbull (@smtrumbull.bsky.social) 2025-11-10T14:45:07.808Z
Supreme Court denies review of Kim Davisâ petition that sought to overturn Obergefell www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-kim-davis-petition-obergefell-same-sex-marriage-rcna242618
It would have taken four justices to grant to review. No justices noted any dissent from the denial.
Davis is the former Kentucky county clerk who made headlines a decade ago for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples on religious grounds in the wake of the Obergefell decision.
Her failed petition sought to upend a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, which affirmed her loss in a civil case brought by David Moore and David Ermold, whose marriage license she refused. Successfully opposing Supreme Court review, Moore and Ermold wrote that Obergefell was correctly decided, and there is no need to revisit it.