Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pets

Siwsan

(27,823 posts) Tue Feb 3, 2026, 06:02 PM 12 hrs ago

My handsome, glossy Wizard

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My handsome, glossy Wizard (Original Post) Siwsan 12 hrs ago OP

Such a handsome guy! SheltieLover 11 hrs ago #1

So handsome. Nanuke 11 hrs ago #2

;-{) Goonch 11 hrs ago #3

Love it! Siwsan 10 hrs ago #5

Merlin may be the best looking Wizard 🧙‍♀️ around. Polly Hennessey 10 hrs ago #4

aww., i twat i taww a puddy tat. i did . i did twa a puddy tat. AllaN01Bear 9 hrs ago #6

Gorgeous! 2naSalit 9 hrs ago #7

SheltieLover

(78,092 posts)

1. Such a handsome guy!

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 06:08 PM

11 hrs ago

Ty for sharing him with us.

Nanuke

(911 posts)

2. So handsome.

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 06:08 PM

11 hrs ago

Goonch

(4,359 posts)

3. ;-{)

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 06:35 PM

11 hrs ago

Siwsan

(27,823 posts)

5. Love it!

Reply to Goonch (Reply #3)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 07:25 PM

10 hrs ago

Polly Hennessey

(8,649 posts)

4. Merlin may be the best looking Wizard 🧙‍♀️ around.

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 07:13 PM

10 hrs ago

AllaN01Bear

(28,833 posts)

6. aww., i twat i taww a puddy tat. i did . i did twa a puddy tat.

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 08:53 PM

9 hrs ago

le purrfect.

2naSalit

(100,849 posts)

7. Gorgeous!

Reply to Siwsan (Original post)

Tue Feb 3, 2026, 09:04 PM

9 hrs ago

He's got those Madoc ears! I wonder if he's related somehow.

He's beautiful! I love that he has a great personality too!

Reply to this discussion