Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
An island of
Sanity
In a sea of
Insanity


Mirt!
Mirt!
Mirt!
Thank you
for taking
out the
dirt!

AMERICA
LOVE IT
OR
FIX IT


Wherever
you go,
there
you are

Donate to
candidates
in the blue
dot (Omaha)
to help flip
the House!!!
The Last Day
of the Fund
Drive
Is A Fun Day
At the
Best Website
DU!!!!
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

alp227

(32,883 posts)
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 09:35 PM Jan 2012

Judge tosses $3.25M award against San Jose (but upheld ruling against police for seizing kids)

Henry K. Lee, SF Chronicle

San Jose police acted recklessly when they placed a family's three children into protective custody despite any evidence they were being abused, but a jury's $3.25 million damage award against the city was excessive, a federal judge has ruled.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Whyte in San Jose said the jury's award in April was "excessive to the extreme" and blamed faulty instructions he gave to members of the panel. Whyte ordered a new trial on whether damages should be awarded to the children's parents, Tracy Watson and Renee Stalker.

But Whyte declined to toss out the verdict altogether in his ruling Wednesday, saying evidence at the trial showed that police "took the children in reckless disregard of plaintiffs' rights and misused and abused their authority."

The case stems from an incident in 2005, when police entered the family's home without a warrant and seized two of their three children, a 4-year-old autistic boy and a 2-year-old boy.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/13/BA8N1MP3T0.DTL

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Judge tosses $3.25M award...