Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

We\'re not
going back!

(=^.^=)

~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
FUCK
DONALD
TRUMP

(=^.^=)
~~~~~~~~
3.1415926535
897932384626
433832795028
841971693993
751058209749
445923078164
062862089986
$ $ $
MONEY
DOES NOT
EQUAL
SPEECH
$ $ $
*****
THE BEST
DEMOCRACY
MONEY CAN
BUY!!
*****
We\'re #1

Who knew?
So many
good Germans
in our party
:-(
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

ck4829

(37,055 posts)
Mon Aug 15, 2022, 12:20 PM Aug 2022

Attorneys argue juries should know they don't need to convict on unpopular abortion and drug laws

Merely mentioning it in court could lead to a mistrial.

Jury nullification, where juries look the other way when someone breaks a law they find unjust, can help a defendant land an acquittal. That get-out-of-jail-free card is all but disappearing from courtrooms.

Defense attorneys want it back and some say the rise in laws criminalizing abortions or continued criminalization of marijuana — or other drug laws — could make the technique more prominent in the future.

Kirsten Tynan, executive director of the Fully Informed Jury Association, is usually scanning social media to find people talking about jury nullification. But the rare legal maneuver rarely popped up until The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

https://www.kcur.org/news/2022-08-11/attorneys-argue-juries-should-know-they-dont-need-to-convict-on-unpopular-abortion-and-drug-laws

Don't let Republicans playing doctor tell you what you can and can not do!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Attorneys argue juries sh...