Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
My cat
can beat
up your
MAGAT
At the very
least,
25_47
He’s
delusional!
least,
25_47
He’s
delusional!
Your
cat
loves me
more
cat
loves me
more
I
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
Give me all
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
Something
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
"Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error ..."
Kevin M. Kruse
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Follow
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
· 1h
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:33 AM
@kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Follow
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
· 1h
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:33 AM
It's fun when judges pretend to be historians, isn't it?
— Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social) 2025-08-05T14:33:59.168Z
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjsdc.bsky.social
Follow
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:12 AM
@mjsdc.bsky.social
Follow
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5378193
August 5, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2025-08-05T14:12:55.159Z
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
