Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumHearing in Coe v. Blanche, June 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., in New York City
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
UPDATE: Judge Failla sets a hearing for 2:30 p.m. Tuesday.
Docket Text
NOTICE of Hearing: This case has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for a hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for emergency relief and provisional class certification, tomorrow, June 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom 618, 40 Foley SquareNew York, NY 10007. (Show Cause Hearing set for 6/23/2026 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) ***No PDF is attached to this entry. (tn) (Entered:
06/22/2026)
ALT
3:30 PM · Jun 22, 2026
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
UPDATE: Judge Failla sets a hearing for 2:30 p.m. Tuesday.
Docket Text
NOTICE of Hearing: This case has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for a hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for emergency relief and provisional class certification, tomorrow, June 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom 618, 40 Foley SquareNew York, NY 10007. (Show Cause Hearing set for 6/23/2026 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) ***No PDF is attached to this entry. (tn) (Entered:
06/22/2026)
ALT
3:30 PM · Jun 22, 2026
UPDATE: Judge Failla sets a hearing for 2:30 p.m. Tuesday.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-06-22T19:30:50.814Z
Coe v. Blanche
LGBTQ Rights
Last Update: June 11, 2026
What's at Stake
Three New York families with adolescent transgender children and two transgender New Yorkers filed a class action lawsuit to protect patient identifying and sensitive health information from being turned over to the Department of Justice in response to federal grand jury subpoenas issued as part of a widespread effort to "end necessary health care for transgender adolescents.
Summary
In May 2026, NYU Langone Hospitals received a grand jury subpoena signed by an Assistant U.S. Attorney located in Fort Worth, Texas, which demanded that they turn over the identities and medical records of any patient who had received medical treatment for gender dysphoria while they were under 18 years old from NYU Langone, from January 2020 through May 2026. Other healthcare institutions in New York City, including Mount Sinai Health System, may have received similar or identical subpoenas.
The grand jury subpoenas followed a year-long effort by the Department of Justice to obtain private medical records through administrative subpoenasefforts that were repeatedly blocked by at least eight federal district court judges. One court dismissed the governments reasoning as a smokescreen, while another concluded the DOJ issued the subpoena first and searched for a justification second.
In June 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York by the American Civil Liberties Union, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and Lambda Legal on behalf of three families with transgender youth and two transgender adults who were minors when they began care. It requests a temporary restraining order blocking the subpoenas from being enforced against NYU Langone, Mt. Sinai, their affiliated providers, as well as any other New York City provider of gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. All plaintiffs have filed under pseudonyms to maintain their privacy and anonymity.
{snip}
LGBTQ Rights
Last Update: June 11, 2026
What's at Stake
Three New York families with adolescent transgender children and two transgender New Yorkers filed a class action lawsuit to protect patient identifying and sensitive health information from being turned over to the Department of Justice in response to federal grand jury subpoenas issued as part of a widespread effort to "end necessary health care for transgender adolescents.
Summary
In May 2026, NYU Langone Hospitals received a grand jury subpoena signed by an Assistant U.S. Attorney located in Fort Worth, Texas, which demanded that they turn over the identities and medical records of any patient who had received medical treatment for gender dysphoria while they were under 18 years old from NYU Langone, from January 2020 through May 2026. Other healthcare institutions in New York City, including Mount Sinai Health System, may have received similar or identical subpoenas.
The grand jury subpoenas followed a year-long effort by the Department of Justice to obtain private medical records through administrative subpoenasefforts that were repeatedly blocked by at least eight federal district court judges. One court dismissed the governments reasoning as a smokescreen, while another concluded the DOJ issued the subpoena first and searched for a justification second.
In June 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York by the American Civil Liberties Union, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and Lambda Legal on behalf of three families with transgender youth and two transgender adults who were minors when they began care. It requests a temporary restraining order blocking the subpoenas from being enforced against NYU Langone, Mt. Sinai, their affiliated providers, as well as any other New York City provider of gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. All plaintiffs have filed under pseudonyms to maintain their privacy and anonymity.
{snip}
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hearing in Coe v. Blanche, June 23, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., in New York City (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
12 hrs ago
OP
TommyT139
(2,492 posts)1. This isn't just about trans kids
... it's about undoing medical privacy, whenever the govt doesn't like a reason for getting treatment, or a group of people getting that treatment.
This case also will give a glimpse about whether a novel trumpist tactic is useful -- in this situation, using a Texas judge to attack New York State protections.
https://www.aclu.org/cases/coe-v-blanche is the full link, and provides a great summary.
slightlv
(8,180 posts)2. I agree with both your statements here..
and remember, they've already stated that "too many" people take SSRI anti-depressants. So, you can probably guess that will be on the list to abscond with our records.