Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

My cat
can beat
up your
MAGAT

At the very
least,

25_47

He’s
delusional!
Your
cat
loves me
more


I
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
Give me all
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
Something
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
 

shockedcanadian

(751 posts)
Sat Aug 9, 2014, 10:29 AM Aug 2014

Police behaviour in woman’s background check ‘malicious,’ lawsuit alleges



http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2014/08/09/police_behaviour_in_womans_background_check_malicious_lawsuit_alleges.html

The Toronto officer who initially responded to her complaint said “no errors had been made, and that the designation ‘won’t be cleared’ on the file and nothing further would be done to change her status as a ‘person of interest,’ ” the statement reads.

“When Sim inquired as to the basis for this conclusion, (the officer) advised that ‘we are the police, you can trust us.’ ”

Frayne’s response that the nonconviction record was “tantamount to treating her as a criminal” was met with no response from the officer, the statement claims.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Police behaviour in woman...