Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

My cat
can beat
up your
MAGAT

At the very
least,

25_47

He’s
delusional!
Your
cat
loves me
more


I
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
Give me all
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
Something
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,671 posts)
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 01:01 PM Mar 2017

The gun-free zone

https://www.policeone.com/active-shooter/articles/295035006-5-things-to-know-about-gun-free-zones/
2. Mass casualty incidents have resulted in pushback against gun-free zones. A common argument against these laws is that they work opposite to how they were intended; instead of keeping the public safer, they prevent law-abiding citizens from carrying but do nothing to stop criminals who intend to do harm.
...
3. Some argue that most mass shootings occur in gun-free zones, and that these sites attract active shooters. Another common argument in this debate is that the majority of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones and that active shooters specifically seek out these sites to carry out their attacks.
...
4. But are these claims true? Here’s where things get muddy. In a 2013 report, Mother Jones found no evidence that any of 62 mass shootings that occurred between 1982-2012 were at sites targeted specifically because of a gun ban. Many of the attackers had a personal connection to the site of their rampage, such as their place of work.
...
A big reason it’s hard to verify whether these claims are factual is because of the various definitions of what constitutes a “mass shooting,” a “gun-free zone,” and the differences in gun prohibition from state to state.


IMO, most mass shooters do not generally choose from a list of gun-free zones as sites for their mayhem. I am fairly sure it crosses the minds of a few of them, after deciding coincidentally on a gun-free venue, that they will face little initial resistance.

>>> I believe that venue owners and operators should have the final decision on whether their property is gun-free.

>>> I believe that venue owners and operators should provide some form of enhanced security if they designate the property gun and/or weapon free.

>>> I believe that counties should share the cost of providing dedicated law enforcement staff with venues over 200,000 square feet. This is in addition to private security.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The gun-free zone (Original Post) discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 OP
Did MJ count the 2012 Aurora shooting? yagotme Mar 2017 #1
I don't know discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #2
Was asking, rhetorically, because of par #4 in your OP, yagotme Mar 2017 #3

yagotme

(4,118 posts)
1. Did MJ count the 2012 Aurora shooting?
Sun Mar 19, 2017, 06:21 PM
Mar 2017

Don't believe it was directly stated, but the perp drove past at least 2 other theaters that were closer to his home, but they weren't gun free zones.

yagotme

(4,118 posts)
3. Was asking, rhetorically, because of par #4 in your OP,
Wed Mar 22, 2017, 11:30 AM
Mar 2017

referencing a MJ "study". I don't get gun news from them, either.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The gun-free zone