Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Your
cat
loves me
more


I
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
Give me all
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
Something
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
You do not
want to
know
what I
think about

Is
TACO
Dead
Yet?


Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NFL HOF vs Hall of Stats (Original Post) Buttoneer Apr 2024 OP
Head to Head Buttoneer Apr 2024 #1
Likability and great team bias of the 70s Hall of famers JT45242 Apr 2024 #2

JT45242

(3,578 posts)
2. Likability and great team bias of the 70s Hall of famers
Sun Apr 7, 2024, 11:45 PM
Apr 2024

The NFL Hall of fame is full of a ton of good players from great teams while leaving off great players from good teams.

The two Bengals Kenny's are a great example.

Kenny Riley was statistically better than the defensive backs from the Steelers, Raiders, and Cowboys era that he played in. But, the Bengals never won a Superbowl.

Kenny Anderson was statistically the best QB of his era...2 MVP, but did not win a Superbowl.

Unlike Dan Fouts, he never was an announcer rubbing elbows with voters for all those years.

Kenny Anderson had better stats than Bradshaw, Stabler, staubach, but not the great team results.

It is the great weakness of the NFL HOF. Players who belong in the hall of very good who happened to be on great teams that won multiple Superbowl while leaving out players who did not win super bowls like the Kenny's.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»NFL HOF vs Hall of Stats