Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ponietz

(4,554 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:58 AM 1 hr ago

I didn't think World Cup management and officiating would be "fair", but here we go in the first round already

Verdict: Messi's challenge was unnecessary and he was fortunate that the outcome was not a red card.

When challenging from behind with studs-on-calf contact and a level of force, the outcome should be a red card.

Whether Messi had no intent to foul in this manner is irrelevant; intent is not a consideration in law, and the facts of any contact should be the defining factor.

Messi was lucky as, in my opinion, this was a red card offense. It happened with the score at 1-0 and could have had a big impact on the game. It would have also impacted Messi's ability to play the rest of the World Cup group games, as a one-match ban could have occurred.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49027532/world-cup-2026-var-review-red-card-penalty-handball-goal-line-technology

Also, Iran should be playing in Mexico or Canada. Forcing their commute to and from the US on the same day they play is onerous and adds more than a few hours of stress filled travel. Their team should be treated like any other as long as they’re competing.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I didn't think World Cup management and officiating would be "fair", but here we go in the first round already (Original Post) Ponietz 1 hr ago OP
Not to be "that guy", but intent is very much a consideration in law. Climate Crusader 1 hr ago #1
I think it was a typo -- "not a consideration in the law" defining a red card offense Ponietz 1 hr ago #2
Hope we do Traildogbob 1 hr ago #3
On Twitter last night awesomerwb1 25 min ago #4

Climate Crusader

(181 posts)
1. Not to be "that guy", but intent is very much a consideration in law.
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 11:01 AM
1 hr ago

Maybe not on a futbol pitch, but very much so in the courtroom.

Ponietz

(4,554 posts)
2. I think it was a typo -- "not a consideration in the law" defining a red card offense
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 11:06 AM
1 hr ago

Of course, you are correct otherwise.

Traildogbob

(13,280 posts)
3. Hope we do
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 11:10 AM
1 hr ago

Not Have NBA level of officiating and favoritism towards stars like Wamby got. 😡

awesomerwb1

(5,172 posts)
4. On Twitter last night
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 11:47 AM
25 min ago

there were many, many people voicing their displeasure at FIFA's double standards. The previous world cup in Qatar was rigged (many people believe) for either of the PSG boys to win the world cup. PSG are the French club team that is owned by the Qataris for which Messi, Mbappe, and Neymar played at the time.

99.9999% of the players commit that foul like Messi did, and it's an automatic yellow card reviewable by VAR for a potential red card. He got neither.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Soccer/Football»I didn't think World Cup ...