Jewish Group
Related: About this forumKill Jews, Get Your Own State - WSJ Editorial
The leaders of France, Canada and the United Kingdom think theyre doing a good deed by saying theyll soon recognize a state of Palestine at the United Nations. Maybe they should listen to the response from Hamas, which thinks this recognition is a reward for slaughtering Jews.
Thats the only way to interpret comments Saturday by Hamas Politburo member Ghazi Hamad on Al Jazeera. The powerful blow that was delivered to Israel on Oct. 7 has yielded three very important historic achievements. First of all, it brought the Palestinian cause back. Why are all these countries recognizing Palestine now? he asked. Good question. The overall outcome of Oct. 7, Mr. Hamad continued, forced the world to open its eyes to the Palestinian cause, and to act forcefully in this respect. Massacre as a political strategy has long been Hamas practice, but its still remarkable to hear it stated with such unvarnished aplomb.
The three Western countries are demanding that Israel accept a cease-fire deal, but Israel already has. Hamas rejects it. And after the recognition news, Hamas wont even come to the table. It prefers to foil aid distribution to Gaza and drag out the civilian suffering, confident it can manipulate Western opinion by blaming Israel for the hunger photos it uses to influence the gullible West. Good job, everyone.
France, the U.K. and Canada call on Hamas to demilitarize, but Mr. Hamad on Al Jazeera declared that anathema. The weapons constitute the Palestinian cause, he said. Surrendering our weapons means the end of the resistance and the end of the Palestinian cause.
This is the same Mr. Hamad who said a few weeks after Oct. 7, We will do this again and again. Less publicized but equally telling was his explanation. We are the victims, Mr. Hamad said. Therefore, nobody should blame us for the things we do. On Oct. 7, on Oct. 10, on October one-millionth, everything we do is justified. Maybe Mr. Hamad can be foreign minister of the new state.
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/ghazi-hamad-hamas-palestinian-state-israel-2290c711?st=VcoCBt&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
free

rickyhall
(5,483 posts)stopdiggin
(14,268 posts)and I'm not sure if it is justified by following an OP that expresses something of the same - with the exception that the 'opinion piece' in the WSJ, is clearly identifying the extremists as Hamas .... Whereas you ....
lostincalifornia
(4,222 posts)in Gaza by limiting food supplies in Gaza is what motivated them calling for a Palestinian state.
From what I understand Israel has said they want to take charge over Gaza, and replace it with a Palestinian authority that doesn't call for the destruction of Israel.
I am not sure why that could not have been done earlier in this conflict, because it might have eliminated so much suffering.