Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(163,098 posts)
Sat Feb 8, 2025, 08:58 AM Feb 8

Experts Discover Ancient Life Locked Inside a 2.5 Billion-Year-Old Ruby as a Residue

Experts concluded that graphite was an ancient living matter based on the carbon atoms inside it.

BY SOMDATTA MAITY
PUBLISHED JAN 24, 2025



Ruby and Kyanite (Representative Cover Image Source: Wikimedia Commons | Photo by StrangerThanKindness)

In 2021 inside an opulent gemstone, researchers found evidence of ancient life. The gemstone in question was a 2.5 billion-year-old ruby from Greenland, the University of Waterloo stated. Researchers observed that the ruby sample contained graphite, a mineral made out of pure carbon. Further examination proved that the mineral was a remnant of ancient life. Findings regarding the ruby were published in Ore Geology Reviews and Chemical Geology.



Picture of Ruby (Representative Image Source: Wikimedia Commons/Photo by Robert M. Lavinsky)

The research team traveled to southwest Greenland to find the conditions required for ruby formation. They specifically chose the Archean North Atlantic Craton because it hosted the oldest known deposits of the gemstone. The research team was delighted to have such a rare discovery on their hands. "The graphite inside this ruby is really unique. It’s the first time we’ve seen evidence of ancient life in ruby-bearing rocks," said Chris Yakymchuk, professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Waterloo. "The presence of graphite also gives us more clues to determine how rubies formed at this location, something that is impossible to do directly based on a ruby’s color and chemical composition.”

Experts concluded that graphite was an ancient living matter based on the carbon atoms inside it. Examination through isotopic composition revealed that 98 percent of all carbon atoms in the graphite had a mass of 12 atomic units. Living matter is always more likely to take up lighter carbon atoms because of energy concerns. Hence, researchers asserted that the graphite was the remnant of an ancient living matter. A few carbon atoms that comprised the two percent had a mass of 13 or 14 atomic mass units.

"Living matter preferentially consists of the lighter carbon atoms because they take less energy to incorporate into cells," explained Yakymchuk. "Based on the increased amount of carbon-12 in this graphite, we concluded that the carbon atoms were once ancient life, most likely dead microorganisms such as cyanobacteria."

Researchers also claimed that the living matter was necessary for the survival of ruby. The graphite influenced the chemical composition of surrounding rocks, creating a favorable environment for the ruby to thrive. According to the analysis done by researchers, in the absence of the living matter, that particular region could not have hosted rubies. The rock where the ancient living matter has been found was determined to be somewhere around 2.5 billion years old. At that time, oxygen was not abundant in the atmosphere, with microorganisms and algae films being the only life forms on Earth.

More:
https://www.frontpagedetectives.com/latest-news/experts-discover-ancient-life-locked-inside-a-2-5-billion-year-old-ruby-as-a-residue

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts Discover Ancient Life Locked Inside a 2.5 Billion-Year-Old Ruby as a Residue (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 8 OP
Fascinating JMCKUSICK Feb 8 #1
"Normal" isotopic abundance is 98.9 to 1.07%, C-12 vs C-13. C-14 only traces. Something's not right here. eppur_se_muova Feb 8 #2
I think this article has misread the press release muriel_volestrangler Feb 8 #3
OK, thanks. Good data, good paper, bad journos (again) ? eppur_se_muova Feb 8 #4
Beat me to it. One can see the effects of C13 natural abundance in the mass... NNadir Feb 12 #5

eppur_se_muova

(38,541 posts)
2. "Normal" isotopic abundance is 98.9 to 1.07%, C-12 vs C-13. C-14 only traces. Something's not right here.
Sat Feb 8, 2025, 04:10 PM
Feb 8
https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Compositions/stand_alone.pl?ele=C

Atomic Weights and Isotopic Compositions for Carbon
Isotope Relative
Atomic Mass Isotopic
Composition Standard
Atomic Weight Notes

6 C 12 12.0000000(00) 0.9893(8) [12.0096, 12.0116]
13 13.003 354 835 07(23) 0.0107(8)
14 14.003 241 9884(40)

NIST Physical Measurement LaboratoryAtomic Weights and Isotopic Compositions Main Page


According to the excerpt from the article, this sample appears to be substantially enriched in C-13, contradicting the conclusion. Suggests more data with more sig figs needed.

muriel_volestrangler

(103,217 posts)
3. I think this article has misread the press release
Sat Feb 8, 2025, 07:30 PM
Feb 8

The press release just mentions

"More than 98 per cent of all carbon atoms have a mass of 12 atomic mass units, but a few carbon atoms are heavier, with a mass of 13 or 14 atomic mass units."

without saying how much this sample had. The actual paper talks about "delta 13C" (section 6.3), with negative figures, and goes into detail I won't pretend to understand to conclude that it's most likely biological carbon.

eppur_se_muova

(38,541 posts)
4. OK, thanks. Good data, good paper, bad journos (again) ?
Sat Feb 8, 2025, 09:26 PM
Feb 8

I'd say delta 13C is a pretty clear indicator of C-13 depletion, not enrichment. And it's probably 2% of the normal abundance, not the total abundance -- i.e. 1.07% depleted by ~2% OF 1.07% to give around 1.05%. (hence the quibble re. sig figs)

NNadir

(35,307 posts)
5. Beat me to it. One can see the effects of C13 natural abundance in the mass...
Wed Feb 12, 2025, 04:15 PM
Feb 12

...spectrometry of molecules with a molecular weight roughly around 500 amu or higher.

It comes up when one chooses the stable heavy isotope labeling of internal standards. It turns out that the higher the molecular weight is, the more heavy isotopes need to be added to distinguish the standard from the molecules for which the analysis is intended, since statistically a certain number of C13 will be naturally incorporated.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Experts Discover Ancient ...