Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas blasts progressivism as threat to America - ABC News
Thomas said that the values enshrined in the 1776 Declaration of Independence have fallen out of favor among Americans.
====================
I have the same question regarding Clarence Thomas as Orrex has about Trump.
Ocelot II
(130,855 posts)You wouldn't have been appointed to the Supreme Court according to the values of the new United States in 1776. You wouldn't have even been allowed to learn to read. Progressivism is what got you your job.
displacedvermoter
(4,766 posts)I understand what you are saying, I guess.
displacedvermoter
(4,766 posts)Right wingers always point to the Declaration of Independence as their go to document, over the Constitution. Shrub and his crew always cited the Declaration as justification for whatever they were doing. The Constitution has that nasty Bill of Rights and they hate all but a couple of the amendments.
But yeah, back in those enlightened days of 1776, Clarence might have been lucky and worked as one of the signer's butlers, or he could have ended up a field hand. And nobody would have given two shits for his opinions, either way, on anything, never mind the law.
sop
(18,901 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,376 posts)Harker
(17,920 posts)"I hope so!"
SamKnause
(14,925 posts)You are a corrupt piece of trash.
There certainly is nothing supreme about you or this court.
You should be in prison not on the bench.
Blue Owl
(59,332 posts)marble falls
(72,176 posts)... one of your "friends".
jls4561
(3,209 posts)I got mine, screw the rest of you. Its his theory of jurisprudence.
Autumn
(48,978 posts)eppur_se_muova
(42,144 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,084 posts)as the country did. That's part of the freedom it is designed to protect.
Conservatives are the ones who the Constitution has fallen out of favor with. They want to restrict other's freedom.
Baitball Blogger
(52,514 posts)The greatest failure of our democracy was not listening to Anita Hill and taking her seriously enough to stop Clarence Thomas from soiling the reputation of the Supreme Court.
Stargazer99
(3,532 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,291 posts)Article III clearly spells out the S.C.'s job which is to interpret the latter not the former, so is Thomas abandoning his oath to the Constitution?
The Declaration of Independence wasn't a marriage, it was a divorce.
Thanks for the thread TexasTowelie
struggle4progress
(126,446 posts)FDRFTW
(98 posts)The problem
Here is he fails to define progressivism.
And one could easily plug in the word conservatism
And give the exact same meaningless speech.
Example:
Conservatism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government,
Thomas said in a speech at the University of Texas Austin Law School pegged to the nations upcoming milestone birthday.
A spirit of cynicism, rejection, hostility and animus toward America -- by Americans -- has taken hold, Thomas said in remarks carried live on CSPAN.