Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(66,061 posts)
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 11:41 AM 6 hrs ago

Supreme Court Approves Mail-In Voting, But Trump Keeps Pushing Extremist SAVE Act Ahead of Midterms



President Donald Trump has received another setback in his ongoing quest to control U.S. elections. In a 5-4 split, the Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots do not need to be received by Election Day to be counted, as long as they were postmarked by then. Although a “rare victory for voting rights,” the conservative justices’ assertion that voting by mail is prone to fraud — a disproven theory that Trump blames his loss in the 2020 election for — is “very disturbing,” says Ari Berman, the national voting rights correspondent for Mother Jones. “My fear is that this is going to embolden Republicans to double down on their efforts to try to get rid of mail voting, including the SAVE America Act, Trump’s sweeping voter suppression bill, which he seems desperate to go to any lengths to try to pass,” says Berman, who also comments on the court’s decision to strike down a federal law limiting campaign spending.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Approves Mail-In Voting, But Trump Keeps Pushing Extremist SAVE Act Ahead of Midterms (Original Post) Uncle Joe 6 hrs ago OP
There is so much in that bill that is either unconstitutional, already in violation of current court hlthe2b 6 hrs ago #1

hlthe2b

(115,262 posts)
1. There is so much in that bill that is either unconstitutional, already in violation of current court
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 11:48 AM
6 hrs ago

opinions re: related executive orders, in violation of current state or Federal laws, or just impossible to enact given the burden on the American voters and officials and volunteer poll workers implementing any changes. If that ridiculous monstrous bill passed, it would take minimal time for a nation-wide injunction, IMO. And that opinion is not without company...

Surely there are lawyers in Congress that would tell them that? I know the WH lawyers are worthless, but...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Supreme Court Approves Ma...