General Discussion

calimary

(88,084 posts)

69. Welcome to DU, LiberalBrooke!

Mon Apr 2, 2018, 03:40 PM

Apr 2018

Yep. Unfortunately, that's probably a lot of it. They'd go after her if she were a man, because she's a liberal and a Democrat, but she's a MASSIVE repeat target, so the magnitude and frequency was amped WAY up.

She's an uppity woman, who doesn't know her "proper" (read: subservient) place. And we simply cannot have that, now, can we.

https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-americas-largest-local-tv-owner-turned-its-news-anc-1824233490

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton responds to her critics: "They never said that to any man who was not elected." [View all] Miles Archer Mar 2018 OP

Why? duforsure Mar 2018 #1

Hell no, Butterflylady Mar 2018 #2

I can't imagine Trump PatSeg Mar 2018 #4

Except, strangely, about Stormy Daniels PJMcK Mar 2018 #9

I know PatSeg Mar 2018 #31

Because she is a woman. LiberalBrooke Mar 2018 #36

Welcome to DU, LiberalBrooke! calimary Apr 2018 #69

In fact, the plan was the opposite caraher Mar 2018 #40

He literally failed all the way to the top. Nailzberg Mar 2018 #64

Groan... lunatica Mar 2018 #67

I'd like to see her become more vocal and less circumspect in her statements than ever before. Squinch Mar 2018 #3

Yes PatSeg Mar 2018 #32

+ a million or so! BlueMTexpat Mar 2018 #66

Why should she not speak out? Trumpie is still running against her, rather than actual governance. mackdaddy Mar 2018 #5

+1 dalton99a Mar 2018 #34

Lets face it--many Democrats have said or indicated for her to be quiet. Yes they have... riversedge Mar 2018 #51

She won the popular vote by 3 million votes Nonhlanhla Mar 2018 #6

Don't forget about the secret involvement of Russia Farmer-Rick Mar 2018 #27

Damn right! edhopper Mar 2018 #28

Also, Nonhlanhla, the russian collusion Cha Mar 2018 #60

Did running for president remove her 1st admendment rights? nt Ferrets are Cool Mar 2018 #7

+2,000 Angry Dragon Mar 2018 #10

No. Her uterus did. EffieBlack Mar 2018 #13

Boom! This! NurseJackie Mar 2018 #22

I hate to disagree with you but that is not correct... Ferrets are Cool Mar 2018 #49

You've got a point there EffieBlack Mar 2018 #50

There ya go. Now we agree 100%. Ferrets are Cool Mar 2018 #52

Hillary and Obama should both speak up more FakeNoose Mar 2018 #8

They should if they want to EffieBlack Mar 2018 #14

It is wrong for people to say she should not speak, however karynnj Mar 2018 #11

"The Clinton wing of the party pushed Kerry to stop talking ... as he introduced Kerry/Feingold" EffieBlack Mar 2018 #16

Its an empty phrase used to malign Clinton. NCTraveler Mar 2018 #21

There were many articles in 2006 that made it clear that the Clintons thought karynnj Mar 2018 #45

Considering neither article you linked to even mentions Clinton EffieBlack Mar 2018 #46

Your arguments RARELY have any proof attached -- karynnj Mar 2018 #47

When was the last time a sitting president(fake) attacked their opponent Angry Dragon Mar 2018 #12

Reagan attacked Carter during the 1984 campaign. bluescribbler Mar 2018 #41

But did Raygun attack after he was elected?? Angry Dragon Mar 2018 #44

He did. bluescribbler Apr 2018 #70

It's like the song "Every Breath You Take" betsuni Mar 2018 #15

"..and idiots were right there saying she was pandering to spice-eaters." Cha Mar 2018 #61

Well, she pretty well nailed it because it is true & she provided the facts of the matter. DylanUSC Mar 2018 #17

The problem is, facts don't matter in Trumpland. vsrazdem Mar 2018 #19

Only "alternative facts." 3catwoman3 Mar 2018 #29

Understand but for those you are speaking of that seems it will always be the case. DylanUSC Mar 2018 #43

Not to mention DownriverDem Mar 2018 #25

I think she should speak as much as she wants, BUT I don't like her answer. thesquanderer Mar 2018 #18

Romney, Gore weren't constantly and viciously attacked by the new president, his base and a network EffieBlack Mar 2018 #23

It is good politics for them BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #30

Yes. Your answer is better than Hillary's. thesquanderer Mar 2018 #33

There is more than one answer EffieBlack Mar 2018 #35

I agree that she'd be attacked either way. thesquanderer Mar 2018 #37

Obama and Democrats were not attacking Romney after the election JI7 Mar 2018 #53

These critics of Clinton are often the same ones who say gratuitous Mar 2018 #20

The lame protest against her Rutgers speech (organized on Our Revolution) comes to mind... NurseJackie Mar 2018 #24

Oh yes.. the "our revolution" protest that decided Cha Mar 2018 #62

I encourage the GOP to continue to run against her bronxiteforever Mar 2018 #26

also she was elected barbtries Mar 2018 #38

God bless Hillary! left-of-center2012 Mar 2018 #39

Actually... that's nonsense. They say it to almost EVERY man who was not elected FBaggins Mar 2018 #42

Specific examples with links? EffieBlack Mar 2018 #48

Here's a few... hughee99 Mar 2018 #54

Thanks for taking the time to find an post these links. EffieBlack Mar 2018 #55

I know this isn't something that we're really supposed to say, but there were a lot of people hughee99 Mar 2018 #56

I didn't say it was "totally" based on her gender. In fact, I explicitly said it was not totally EffieBlack Mar 2018 #57

Sorry, I misread your comment hughee99 Mar 2018 #58

No problem - we all do it EffieBlack Mar 2018 #59

True dat. Susan Calvin Mar 2018 #63

Damn straight! BobTheSubgenius Mar 2018 #65

John MCCain was on every network years after losing to Obama malaise Mar 2018 #68