Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Artcatt

(344 posts)
11. AI's sole purpose is to eliminate employees regardless of
Fri Jul 14, 2023, 01:23 AM
Jul 2023

what the AI boosters say. It’s not about our “being afraid of” technology. It’s how it’s always used to eliminate workers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Linking to the LBN thread about studios wanting to exploit actors via AI: highplainsdem Jul 2023 #1
We must insist on all such AI moniss Jul 2023 #2
We draw a line against AI now, or see most humans replaced in most highplainsdem Jul 2023 #3
I concur wholeheartedly moniss Jul 2023 #5
I agree on labelling. Using AI for, say, programming is greatly different from authoring Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #17
As far as I can see, "train AI on their work" doesn't mean the contract Emrys Jul 2023 #4
There are already companies training AI on specific authors' work to copy highplainsdem Jul 2023 #6
No, your OP title is misleading. Emrys Jul 2023 #7
We'll see. But as I said in the email.I sent you, the data set of a very famous highplainsdem Jul 2023 #8
Nevertheless, that's not what's discussed by others in the industry in that Twitter thread. Emrys Jul 2023 #9
I stand by what I said. Having an AI trained on the data set of a famous author highplainsdem Jul 2023 #10
I've edited the OP to include a later tweet with a TikTok video with more details highplainsdem Jul 2023 #12
It would be to promote it as trained on the author, sold as if "almost the real thing" Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #14
AI's sole purpose is to eliminate employees regardless of Artcatt Jul 2023 #11
Wrong. Not the sole purpose. Finding new medicines does NOT eliminate workers Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #16
There are types of AI that are helpful. This is not one of them. highplainsdem Jul 2023 #19
It either is the author or the AI. I will will not buy fiction written by AI Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #13
Non-fiction isn't simply a collection of facts. There's judgment involved. And perspective. highplainsdem Jul 2023 #18
Yes. AI can be useful to assist non-fiction writers by fact-checking and completing datasets Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #27
I copy-edit almost solely non-fiction and academic titles. Emrys Jul 2023 #22
Thank you for a thoughtful post with insight from experience. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #24
AI-written fiction reminds me of the New Coke debacle. But even less desirable Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #15
I'm not okay with lab created stories, songs or video. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2023 #20
This Is Inevitable. If It Can Be Done, It Will Be Done. MineralMan Jul 2023 #21
No, it isn't inevitable, and should not be considered acceptable. Just highplainsdem Jul 2023 #23
I did not say that I approved of it. I don't. MineralMan Jul 2023 #25
I think some heirs and owners of intellectual property will welcome it Johonny Jul 2023 #26
Yup. The fight is on, apparently. MineralMan Jul 2023 #31
The people pushing AI want us to call it inevitable so it will be viewed highplainsdem Jul 2023 #30
In the end, the audience is going to decide what is acceptable. MineralMan Jul 2023 #32
"Writing to fit a formula, often called hackwork, can be done by humans" Emrys Jul 2023 #28
It is inevitable so it must be required to be labelled. But emulating an author with their name Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At least one publisher as...»Reply #11