Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(149,857 posts)
21. This Is Inevitable. If It Can Be Done, It Will Be Done.
Fri Jul 14, 2023, 10:30 AM
Jul 2023

I made my living for almost my entire adult life through writing. Not fiction, but non-fiction articles for magazines. Major ones. Here's why AI will work to replace writers to some degree:

Early on in my writing career, I realized what it would take for me to be successful in the magazine world. Over about a year, I learned to create specific algorithms for different magazines I wanted to write for. It wasn't as difficult as you might think. Here is what my process was for creating an algorithm for any magazine I intended to write for:

First, I bought the most recent two issues of that magazine and quickly read through them.

Next, I read them in a more detailed way, focusing on the articles that were the most similar in subject matter to what I hoped to sell to that publication. I took notes, to help me create the algorithm for that type of article in that particular publication. Some of the things I included in the algorithm:

Article word count.
Average length of paragraphs.
Average length of sentence.
Level of diction - what words were chosen to use, related to reading ability of their target audience.
Style details: Use of Boston comma. Punctuation style (semicolons?) Pronoun usages. Point of view and references to readers.
Use of metaphors.
Logical structure of article - Style of lede, length of introduction, number of paragraphs for structural purposes, assumptions about readers, method of summing up and conclusion.

There was more, of course, in my eventual algorithm for each magazine. That algorithm fit on a single page, which I filed for reference when needed.

Once I had the algorithm, based on current issues, I looked at the most recent year's issues to create an editorial calendar for that magazine. Typically, at the time, queries to editors needed to be made about 6 months in advance of issue date. Then, I'd come up with possible articles for an issue six months out and send that list of proposals. to the editor most likely to be the editor I might be working with. That also took some research effort. Of course, I also included information about myself, if I was unknown to the editor.

This did not always work, of course. But it did work well enough to get me a foot in the door in enough cases. Then, I followed my own rules for myself. What I sent to the magazine for that first assignment was an article that was error-free, on time, at the length that type of article usually had, and in the style of that magazine. The style was always based on my assessment of the algorithm used in recent issues.

It worked for me. Editors liked seeing my stuff come in, because it was already very close to what it would turn out to be, after their editing. That meant less work for them and ensured that my proposals would have a better chance of becoming assignments.

Algorithms are what AI is about. That's why an AI text generation program can closely mimic the output from a writer who writes similar things over and over again. Some novelists make their careers from writing formulaic novels. They have an internal algorithm for creating those books. Same thing. AI can do that, and will do that, with or without the permission of the authors. Guaranteed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Linking to the LBN thread about studios wanting to exploit actors via AI: highplainsdem Jul 2023 #1
We must insist on all such AI moniss Jul 2023 #2
We draw a line against AI now, or see most humans replaced in most highplainsdem Jul 2023 #3
I concur wholeheartedly moniss Jul 2023 #5
I agree on labelling. Using AI for, say, programming is greatly different from authoring Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #17
As far as I can see, "train AI on their work" doesn't mean the contract Emrys Jul 2023 #4
There are already companies training AI on specific authors' work to copy highplainsdem Jul 2023 #6
No, your OP title is misleading. Emrys Jul 2023 #7
We'll see. But as I said in the email.I sent you, the data set of a very famous highplainsdem Jul 2023 #8
Nevertheless, that's not what's discussed by others in the industry in that Twitter thread. Emrys Jul 2023 #9
I stand by what I said. Having an AI trained on the data set of a famous author highplainsdem Jul 2023 #10
I've edited the OP to include a later tweet with a TikTok video with more details highplainsdem Jul 2023 #12
It would be to promote it as trained on the author, sold as if "almost the real thing" Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #14
AI's sole purpose is to eliminate employees regardless of Artcatt Jul 2023 #11
Wrong. Not the sole purpose. Finding new medicines does NOT eliminate workers Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #16
There are types of AI that are helpful. This is not one of them. highplainsdem Jul 2023 #19
It either is the author or the AI. I will will not buy fiction written by AI Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #13
Non-fiction isn't simply a collection of facts. There's judgment involved. And perspective. highplainsdem Jul 2023 #18
Yes. AI can be useful to assist non-fiction writers by fact-checking and completing datasets Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #27
I copy-edit almost solely non-fiction and academic titles. Emrys Jul 2023 #22
Thank you for a thoughtful post with insight from experience. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #24
AI-written fiction reminds me of the New Coke debacle. But even less desirable Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #15
I'm not okay with lab created stories, songs or video. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2023 #20
This Is Inevitable. If It Can Be Done, It Will Be Done. MineralMan Jul 2023 #21
No, it isn't inevitable, and should not be considered acceptable. Just highplainsdem Jul 2023 #23
I did not say that I approved of it. I don't. MineralMan Jul 2023 #25
I think some heirs and owners of intellectual property will welcome it Johonny Jul 2023 #26
Yup. The fight is on, apparently. MineralMan Jul 2023 #31
The people pushing AI want us to call it inevitable so it will be viewed highplainsdem Jul 2023 #30
In the end, the audience is going to decide what is acceptable. MineralMan Jul 2023 #32
"Writing to fit a formula, often called hackwork, can be done by humans" Emrys Jul 2023 #28
It is inevitable so it must be required to be labelled. But emulating an author with their name Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2023 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At least one publisher as...»Reply #21