General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here are the negatives I see for each of the VP options... [View all]pinkstarburst
(1,810 posts)getting Kamala's message out. He is so well spoken. He does well under fire. He is youthful and inspiring and I think he would encourage the same vitality and energy in the campaign that Kamala currently has fired up. We need someone who generates energy and lights a fire under our base and gets them excited to vote.
ROY COOPER -In addition to the issues caused by the Lt. Governor, he's one of the older potential candidates. I would rather have a pick that can be set up to be president in 8 years.
JOSH SHAPIRO -I was really excited about him at first and he's probably still my second choice, but the school vouchers thing and the fact that we could lose MI and WI makes me nervous. Does taking him out of Pennsylvania mean if there are voting shenanigans, we won't have a governor in place to stop them?
TIM WALZ -I don't really have an opinion on Walz either way. What does he gain us, other than being a white male governor? We usually win MN.
ANDY BESHEAR -Same as Walsh, I don't really have an opinion on Beshear, but I don't see the positives either. We won't win Kentucky anyway, so it seems like all we'd be doing is taking a Democratic governor out of a red state where we likely won't get a democratic governor elected again.
MARK KELLY- I haven't seen him on any talk shows. Is he a good speaker? Does he have energy that can keep us going for the next 100 days? I am also concerned about the loss of the AZ senate seat.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):