Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tom Rinaldo

(23,096 posts)
68. I have no problem with sending that letter...
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 08:31 AM
Monday

Of course Democratic concerns, objections, demands etc. should be officially transmitted in writing. But it is way beyond tone deaf to talk about sending "a very strongly worded letter."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, that oughtta do it. Ocelot II Apr 27 #1
As Rachel says, Don't listen to what people say; watch what they do...What has he done to fix the problem?nt mitch96 Apr 27 #24
What would you anticipate a Senate minority leader would do that's within their legal powers to "fix the problem"? meadowlander Apr 27 #44
Booker and Jeffries gave a damned fine workshop today on the Capitol Steps, getting people engaged and resisting Attilatheblond Apr 27 #55
We're being played Ponietz Apr 27 #36
OOOOOOOOH, a strong letter. That'll show him. Vinca Apr 27 #2
A very strong letter. republianmushroom Apr 27 #54
Completely feckless. choie Apr 27 #3
We need new leaders. yardwork Apr 27 #4
just laughable et tu Apr 27 #5
Good thing the letter was written very strongly dalton99a Apr 27 #6
She should have interviewed Chris Murphy instead of Schumer. CrispyQ Apr 27 #7
Please retire. Passages Apr 27 #8
I hope is was also "sternly worded" BoRaGard Apr 27 #9
Schumer fights incrementally -- the next one in August will be stern Ponietz Apr 27 #37
I don't believe he has interest in the political destruction of Trump. David__77 Apr 27 #10
I think you're right. yardwork Apr 27 #17
i don't know if it's in the 1970s but it's glaringly obvious they sure as hell are stuck. nt orleans Apr 27 #60
How about telling him that not one nominee is going through and moniss Apr 27 #11
Schumer personally blocked two nominees on April 16. lapucelle Apr 27 #52
Then what? Kid Berwyn Apr 27 #12
I'm sure shaking a finger will be next, followed by stomping his feet. Chemical Bill Apr 27 #50
That's telling him, now if Susan will tell Trump she is also concerned that would doc03 Apr 27 #13
Right. yardwork Apr 27 #15
And Schumer's said to be, "The smartest guy in the room". jalan48 Apr 27 #14
Pathetic Ponietz Apr 27 #16
A warrant for the arrest of the idiot would be a helluva lot more appropriate. Ping Tung Apr 27 #18
I'm thinking Schumers next step, would have to be a meeting with Senate Majority Ars Longa Apr 27 #19
He really did say that? How did Schumer get so old and foggy? Baitball Blogger Apr 27 #20
"We sent a letter to someone who can't/won't read." Nice. n/t flvegan Apr 27 #21
sigh Celerity Apr 27 #22
It seems Pelosi had the testicles,... magicarpet Apr 27 #23
I can't say what I'm thinking rn because it might get me banned. harumph Apr 27 #25
Jesus Fucking Christ LuvLoogie Apr 27 #26
This was my planned message. You beat me to it. hatrack Apr 27 #43
Words! Not action! C_U_L8R Apr 27 #27
Schumer is there for a reason WSHazel Apr 27 #28
Go piss up a rope, Schumer. Paladin Apr 27 #29
BFD Faux pas Apr 27 #30
Omg, I called it here: Sky Jewels Apr 27 #31
Replace him, Senators. Like a month ago. Jesus H. It's like he's making fun of us now. Scrivener7 Apr 27 #32
Well, there you have it. taxi Apr 27 #33
And we're excoriating David Hogg for saying these guys need to be primaried Arazi Apr 27 #34
I'm not a huge Schumer fan, but... LudwigPastorius Apr 27 #35
How about joining the Jeffries/Booker sit in today? Arazi Apr 27 #40
Re: a press conference LudwigPastorius Apr 27 #42
You asked for specific examples Arazi Apr 27 #56
# circled was just the people watching AT THE TIME. It varied a lot and didn't count the cumilative # of people who saw Attilatheblond Apr 27 #58
Here. Lots of specific suggestions. Scrivener7 Apr 27 #45
No! Not a Strong Letter!! tavernier Apr 27 #38
(thanks for the chuckle or smirk or whatever my reaction was reading this) nt orleans Apr 27 #61
Oh, my! A strongly-worded letter! Trump will be shaking in his little bunny slippers. Martin68 Apr 27 #39
Oh no! Greg_In_SF Apr 27 #41
Fix the problem??????? bdamomma Apr 27 #46
This is not leadership, its colossal self-importance Ruby the Liberal Apr 27 #47
This. His condescendingly patting us on the head like this, while being our very own Chamberlain, is maddening. Scrivener7 Apr 27 #49
The pompous Dolores umbrages that have been defending every impotent action Schumer has taken are much worse SunImp Apr 27 #59
Not a huge Bash fan senseandsensibility Apr 27 #48
What a moron. Even Dana "I need some carbs" Bash is stunned. Not that it takes much to stun her, but really, Chuck. mucholderthandirt Apr 27 #51
I sounded the alarm when the shitler was winning the republican nomination..... Bread and Circuses Apr 27 #53
I assumed this HAD to be The Onion... regnaD kciN Apr 27 #57
Time for him to resign. This is not leadership... SSJVegeta Monday #62
A very strong letter just the other day asking very strong questions fujiyamasan Monday #63
Does Schumer really think a letter would stop Dump? sakabatou Monday #64
It will be a minor note in the history of all this but the utter inability of Schumer to understand what's happening ... mahatmakanejeeves Monday #65
No! No! Anything but THAT! Buns_of_Fire Monday #66
To be fair SocialDemocrat61 Monday #67
I have no problem with sending that letter... Tom Rinaldo Monday #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen Schumer on response t...»Reply #68