Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beastly Boy

(13,160 posts)
3. From the AP article that reported this incident first:
Sat Jul 5, 2025, 03:07 PM
Jul 5
https://apnews.com/article/palestinians-israel-gaza-contractors-aid-distribution-fe27f3ea83e06a09d66424eed7a5d56f

The [AP] analysts said that the bursts of gunfire and the pop sequences in some of the videos indicated that guns were panning in different directions and were not repeatedly aimed at a single target. They could not pinpoint exactly where the shots were coming from nor who was shooting.

GHF says the Israeli military is not deployed at the aid distribution sites. Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, an army spokesman, said the army is not stationed at the sites or within their immediate proximity, especially during operating hours. He said they’re run by an American company and have their own security.

One of the contractors who had been on the sites said he’d never felt a real or perceived threat by Hamas there.

SRS says that Hamas has openly threatened its aid workers and civilians receiving aid. It did not specify where people were threatened.


and

The AP cannot independently verify the contractors’ stories.
Mentioned twice.

And yet, the default assumption here is that the article you cited is fact-based and not a heavily edited recitation of hearsay, which it is.

Why do you think The Telegraph neglected to mention any of it, and more, in its peculiar rendition of the incident?

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is perverted republicon-values MERCY BoRaGard Jul 5 #1
"Security staff hired to protect the sites were often unqualified and unvetted, and acted with impunity sop Jul 5 #2
Looks like they are in fact very "qualified" - in special ops and "unconventional warfare" among other things. AloeVera Jul 5 #4
Who are "they"? Beastly Boy Jul 5 #11
From the AP article that reported this incident first: Beastly Boy Jul 5 #3
If only the AP reporters would be allowed into Gaza or at GHF sites. AloeVera Jul 5 #5
If only the Guardian published what they knew from the AP article. Beastly Boy Jul 5 #9
From defending the trigger-happy IDF to defending soulless murdering American mercenaries... AloeVera Jul 5 #14
What? Beastly Boy Jul 5 #16
The video does contain unmistakable American-accented voices celebrating possible hits on civilians David__77 Jul 5 #19
You say this as if you saw the video. Beastly Boy Jul 5 #20
See linked article for embedded video David__77 Jul 5 #22
I don't allow X content to be shown in my browser, but I made an exception this time Beastly Boy Jul 5 #23
Anytime a government won't allow the press to see, hear or report what's going on questionseverything Jul 14 #26
Guilt by assosiation. Assumption of guilt in lieu of evidence. Guilty until proven innocent posing as common sense. Beastly Boy Jul 14 #27
Mercenaries malaise Jul 5 #6
Bolstered by systematic evil of the IDF as well. Oneironaut Jul 6 #24
He has a future in ICE Kid Berwyn Jul 5 #7
Right you are. Gimpyknee Jul 5 #8
Reminds me of a scene from Schindler's List PatSeg Jul 5 #10
What have we become Iamscrewed Jul 5 #12
Fucking notsees! Clouds Passing Jul 5 #13
I saw a video many years ago that showed Israeli soldier laughing while shooting at children that were throwing rocks spike jones Jul 5 #15
Some "aid workers" SouthBayDem Jul 5 #17
The AP article of the same story is dated July 2, 2025. Beastly Boy Jul 5 #21
We have so many sick psychopaths in this country. ananda Jul 5 #18
Disgusting Scott Alan Swaggerty Jul 14 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'I think he hit one. Hell...»Reply #3