Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CuriousSavage

(27 posts)
20. I understand your point,
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 11:51 AM
Tuesday

however, think of every city, town and village that has experienced a major deadly or costly weather event. These areas are not turned into nature preserves. People have to live somewhere. Everyone certainly has the choice to move elsewhere but not everyone can actually do it. It might be family, tradition, economic circumstances, age or many other factors. These flood prone areas are likely to be rebuilt but hopefully to higher building code standards.

I work in NYC. After Hurricane Sandy several communities were devastated. You'd think that residents of the hardest hit areas would never come back. Instead, they built it back and it's as populated as ever.... except that many of the houses are raised on higher foundations. Life finds a way of going on, hopefully a little smarter with hard lessons learned.

California has drought, fires, earthquakes. Hawaii has volcanoes. Southwest... >115 degree weather. Midwest.. Tornadoes. Buffalo- Snowfall measured in feet almost daily. Cancer Alley in Louisiana.... Florida- don't get me started. There is an element of danger almost everywhere and there are some places that make no sense whatsoever, yet people will live there.




Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

they had those funky cabins and did not want to pay for new ones higher up the hillside msongs Monday #1
Apparently Jesus works for FEMA BOSSHOG Monday #2
How would having flood insurance prevented the flood 33taw Monday #3
it likely would have priced them into a different location Skittles Monday #4
Maybe they would have built the cabins up the hill to save on insurance. applegrove Monday #5
I saw an interview and the guy said, his cabin is as atop a 30 foot bluff questionseverything Monday #8
The Camp Mystic cabins up the hill were safer. People applegrove Monday #9
I'm saying I think they were used to it being "high enough " questionseverything Monday #10
Yes. Hot air holds more rain in the sky so when storms applegrove Monday #11
they cannot imagine climate change, either Skittles Tuesday #17
Poor kids, surrounded by fools. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Monday #6
It seems like every adult involved in their protection failed them FullySupportDems Monday #7
The counselors were not allowed to have phones and they kept info hidden from them. kerry-is-my-prez Monday #12
I have to agree, the counselors probably shouldn't be lumped in FullySupportDems Tuesday #19
Without question, insurance companies would have required vanlassie Monday #13
America was founded upon freedom OF and FROM religion. NoMoreRepugs Monday #14
You'd be shocked to know how common this is CuriousSavage Monday #15
So would you suggest they rebuild the cabins in the same place applegrove Tuesday #16
I understand your point, CuriousSavage Tuesday #20
I ran and won in Hunterdon County NJ JustAnotherGen Tuesday #21
worthy of its own thread Skittles Tuesday #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Camp Mystic and some Chri...»Reply #20