General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Epstein: Files in the Ointment [View all]H2O Man
(77,542 posts)his father, and another guy who I can't think of at the moment. But yes, without question, they did.
Now, before I return to mowing, I'll say this: there was just a re-trial of a Karen Read in MA. You might be familiar, but for others who aren't, she was accused of killing her boyfriend by backing her SUV into him. Long story short, the FBI had investigated the case, as part of a wider investigation of corruption in the Boston area. The FBI outsources to groups, in this case the most respected in their field, and concluded that she did not hit him. Still, she was prosecuted twice, found "not guilty" by a jury, except for a drinking and driving charge.
The jury was not told that the FBI had hired the experts they heard testifying, because the judge ruled that would give their testimony unfair weight. Why? Because the FBI only outsources to the very best.
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):