Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hamsterjill

(16,358 posts)

2. I am sure she is still bound.

Reply to Enter stage left (Original post)

Wed Jul 16, 2025, 11:57 PM

Jul 16

If not by some document she's signed along the way, then under her law license requiring attorney/client privilege. What *I* don't know if she can ever be compelled to testify before Congress, etc. and given immunity for her testimony. Surely, there are ways and means around things like this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SimplyHadEnough

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A question I don't know the answer too... [View all] Enter stage left Jul 16 OP

The attorney-client privilege is permanent - it doesn't go away Ocelot II Jul 16 #1

Thank you Ocelot II... Enter stage left Jul 17 #3

I too appreciate this stuff Skittles Jul 17 #10

if false stuff was released Skittles Jul 17 #5

That would depend on whether correcting the false information Ocelot II Jul 17 #6

I guess what I don't understand is Skittles Jul 17 #7

The client is the government, technically. Ocelot II Jul 17 #8

ahhhhhhhhh OK Skittles Jul 17 #9

I am sure she is still bound. hamsterjill Jul 16 #2

I'm sure what's said is above is correct given the intelligent sources we have at our disposal on DU AZJonnie Jul 17 #4