Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Thechefs2023

(1 post)

7. I still don't understand this move?

Reply to Ocelot II (Original post)

Thu Jul 17, 2025, 04:51 PM

Jul 17

Isn't this just inviting her to talk by firing her? She doesn't have to give up names but she could say something like "I can see why President Trump wouldn't want the files released..." and just leave it at that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Joinfortmill FakeNoose tonekat Rhiannon12866

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"There is probably nobody who knows more about what's in the Epstein files than Maurene Comey." [View all] Ocelot II Jul 17 OP

I would think she does know a lot more than just about anyone and no employee restraints now..hmmmm Deuxcents Jul 17 #1

She's still bound by attorney-client privilege and federal confidentiality rules Ocelot II Jul 17 #2

The American people are the client hot2na Jul 17 #3

It doesn't work that way when you're prosecuting a case. Ocelot II Jul 17 #5

If it was me I would spill the beans hot2na Jul 17 #9

I don't think you would. The consequences would be pretty serious. Ocelot II Jul 17 #12

Trump's always signaling. Bad things in the "files' could be due to Comey -- not allegorical oracle Jul 17 #4

I think Maurene gives him a convenient connection to her father, someone else Ocelot II Jul 17 #6

I still don't understand this move? Thechefs2023 Jul 17 #7

By even referring to Trump she'd be violating confidentiality requirements - Ocelot II Jul 17 #8

Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jul 18 #18

There's a lot of shit we see and lots more we don't. We could, but we won't. twodogsbarking Jul 17 #10

He's going to say that she's following in her Dad's footsteps Figarosmom Jul 17 #11

I might be missing something, Mtnmama Jul 17 #13

By that time Epstein's case was closed and he was dead, but Maxwell's prosecution Ocelot II Jul 17 #15

Ahem ... (cough, cough) ... Merrick Garland was Attorney General FakeNoose Jul 17 #17

Kristy Greenberg, the legal analyst on Nicole's show. senseandsensibility Jul 17 #14

He wants to disappear some of those files. Joinfortmill Jul 17 #16