Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Justice matters.

(8,654 posts)
11. It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one.
Sun Jul 20, 2025, 06:11 PM
Sunday

But that's what you get with a two-party system, I guess.

One party plays by the rules, the other party breaks them and nobody does anything to stop it (just because of fear of losing, which turns out a losing strategy half of the time).

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is "January 2024" a typo" Martin Eden Sunday #1
No. They were released January 2024 CousinIT Sunday #3
Thanks for the clarification Martin Eden Sunday #16
Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular, KPN Yesterday #39
The president is responsible for serving and protecting the country Martin Eden Yesterday #42
I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding KPN Yesterday #44
Yes, clarity is important to prevent misunderstandings Martin Eden Yesterday #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Melon Sunday #20
Didnt her trial end in 2021? oldmanlynn Yesterday #29
Wasn't it an old story from Clinton/W Bush eras? Reopening that can of worms... brush Sunday #2
I can't see the harm to Hillary. Codifer Sunday #5
Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files. brush Yesterday #21
We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules. mackdaddy Sunday #4
Garland would never have done it, even if they weren't sealed. lees1975 Sunday #8
smith's report on the classified info would be interesting. rampartd Yesterday #22
The argument the MAGAts keep making is The Mouth Sunday #6
I can see why they wouldn't be released after January 2024 nuxvomica Sunday #7
Yeah, like Obama didn't release what he knew about Russia MadameButterfly Sunday #9
lbj kept nixon's meddling quiet rampartd Yesterday #23
I don't think Carter knew at the time MadameButterfly Yesterday #25
i believe bani sadr before any repub. rampartd Yesterday #34
Great article MadameButterfly 19 hrs ago #46
These Beltway lifers are marinated in institutional CYAness Bluetus Yesterday #36
Why not after the election then? MichMan Sunday #10
Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #12
I was referring to the DOJ, not President Biden MichMan Sunday #15
Okay, thanks. Sorry I misinterpreted it. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #19
You mean, Merrick Garland who didn't even prosecute MadameButterfly Yesterday #26
It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one. Justice matters. Sunday #11
K&R UTUSN Sunday #13
Yes. Investigate Biden..... Don't stop there. Norrrm Sunday #14
Love your signature line! Poster/bumper sticker material. KPN Yesterday #40
I really don't give a fuck about release/not release, sealed/not sealed cadoman Sunday #17
Or maybe there were other big names on the list too Polybius Sunday #18
Good. It needs to be rocked. Scrivener7 Yesterday #28
Ding ding ding Hornedfrog2000 Yesterday #32
Well, too bad. We need to know THAT, too. calimary Yesterday #37
Even more reason to release them -- what have we got to lose at this point? KPN Yesterday #41
Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything. Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #24
He literally is Hornedfrog2000 Yesterday #33
Yep... like I said. Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #38
The Biden administration, in its political perspective, still played the game like it was the 70's. lees1975 Yesterday #27
It seems like the doj was complicit in covering up for tRump ecstatic Yesterday #30
The OP stated the files were "legally available" in Jan 2024 Martin Eden Yesterday #31
We look completely feckless Hornedfrog2000 Yesterday #35
We don't look feckless. They however, look rather degenerate. Torchlight Yesterday #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Why didn't BIDEN release...»Reply #11