Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Why didn't BIDEN release the Epstein files!?" Well.... [View all]Justice matters.
(8,654 posts)11. It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one.
But that's what you get with a two-party system, I guess.
One party plays by the rules, the other party breaks them and nobody does anything to stop it (just because of fear of losing, which turns out a losing strategy half of the time).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular,
KPN
Yesterday
#39
I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding
KPN
Yesterday
#44
Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files.
brush
Yesterday
#21
We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules.
mackdaddy
Sunday
#4
Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Sunday
#12
Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything.
Oopsie Daisy
Yesterday
#24