Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cadoman

(1,486 posts)
17. I really don't give a fuck about release/not release, sealed/not sealed
Sun Jul 20, 2025, 07:25 PM
Yesterday

I just want to see the fuckers who were involved with this man--who molested innocent people and bribed our government--put to justice.

Why is someone who fastidiously records his crimes across multiple states and countries so hard to catch? Yeah I expect Blondi to protect him in Florida, but he also plied his trade in New York, New Hampshire, Britain, and certainly other places. So that's at least two blue states and one foreign country who can also bring charges.

Why haven't they? And how does releasing "the list" or any files get us closer to justice when AGs and FBI/CIA are protecting these criminals?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is "January 2024" a typo" Martin Eden Yesterday #1
No. They were released January 2024 CousinIT Yesterday #3
Thanks for the clarification Martin Eden Yesterday #16
Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular, KPN 11 hrs ago #39
The president is responsible for serving and protecting the country Martin Eden 11 hrs ago #42
I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding KPN 10 hrs ago #44
Yes, clarity is important to prevent misunderstandings Martin Eden 10 hrs ago #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Melon Yesterday #20
Didnt her trial end in 2021? oldmanlynn 14 hrs ago #29
Wasn't it an old story from Clinton/W Bush eras? Reopening that can of worms... brush Yesterday #2
I can't see the harm to Hillary. Codifer Yesterday #5
Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files. brush 22 hrs ago #21
We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules. mackdaddy Yesterday #4
Garland would never have done it, even if they weren't sealed. lees1975 Yesterday #8
smith's report on the classified info would be interesting. rampartd 16 hrs ago #22
The argument the MAGAts keep making is The Mouth Yesterday #6
I can see why they wouldn't be released after January 2024 nuxvomica Yesterday #7
Yeah, like Obama didn't release what he knew about Russia MadameButterfly Yesterday #9
lbj kept nixon's meddling quiet rampartd 16 hrs ago #23
I don't think Carter knew at the time MadameButterfly 15 hrs ago #25
i believe bani sadr before any repub. rampartd 13 hrs ago #34
Great article MadameButterfly 2 hrs ago #46
These Beltway lifers are marinated in institutional CYAness Bluetus 12 hrs ago #36
Why not after the election then? MichMan Yesterday #10
Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #12
I was referring to the DOJ, not President Biden MichMan Yesterday #15
Okay, thanks. Sorry I misinterpreted it. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #19
You mean, Merrick Garland who didn't even prosecute MadameButterfly 15 hrs ago #26
It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one. Justice matters. Yesterday #11
K&R UTUSN Yesterday #13
Yes. Investigate Biden..... Don't stop there. Norrrm Yesterday #14
Love your signature line! Poster/bumper sticker material. KPN 11 hrs ago #40
I really don't give a fuck about release/not release, sealed/not sealed cadoman Yesterday #17
Or maybe there were other big names on the list too Polybius Yesterday #18
Good. It needs to be rocked. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #28
Ding ding ding Hornedfrog2000 13 hrs ago #32
Well, too bad. We need to know THAT, too. calimary 12 hrs ago #37
Even more reason to release them -- what have we got to lose at this point? KPN 11 hrs ago #41
Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything. Oopsie Daisy 15 hrs ago #24
He literally is Hornedfrog2000 13 hrs ago #33
Yep... like I said. Oopsie Daisy 12 hrs ago #38
The Biden administration, in its political perspective, still played the game like it was the 70's. lees1975 14 hrs ago #27
It seems like the doj was complicit in covering up for tRump ecstatic 14 hrs ago #30
The OP stated the files were "legally available" in Jan 2024 Martin Eden 14 hrs ago #31
We look completely feckless Hornedfrog2000 13 hrs ago #35
We don't look feckless. They however, look rather degenerate. Torchlight 11 hrs ago #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Why didn't BIDEN release...»Reply #17