General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,161 posts)

19. Okay, thanks. Sorry I misinterpreted it. . . . . . nt

Reply to MichMan (Reply #15)

Sun Jul 20, 2025, 10:17 PM

18 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Why didn't BIDEN release the Epstein files!?" Well.... [View all] CousinIT Yesterday OP

Is "January 2024" a typo" Martin Eden Yesterday #1

No. They were released January 2024 CousinIT Yesterday #3

Thanks for the clarification Martin Eden 21 hrs ago #16

Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular, KPN 4 hrs ago #39

The president is responsible for serving and protecting the country Martin Eden 4 hrs ago #42

I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding KPN 3 hrs ago #44

Yes, clarity is important to prevent misunderstandings Martin Eden 3 hrs ago #45

This message was self-deleted by its author Melon 18 hrs ago #20

Didnt her trial end in 2021? oldmanlynn 7 hrs ago #29

Wasn't it an old story from Clinton/W Bush eras? Reopening that can of worms... brush Yesterday #2

I can't see the harm to Hillary. Codifer 23 hrs ago #5

Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files. brush 15 hrs ago #21

We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules. mackdaddy Yesterday #4

Garland would never have done it, even if they weren't sealed. lees1975 23 hrs ago #8

smith's report on the classified info would be interesting. rampartd 9 hrs ago #22

The argument the MAGAts keep making is The Mouth 23 hrs ago #6

I can see why they wouldn't be released after January 2024 nuxvomica 23 hrs ago #7

Yeah, like Obama didn't release what he knew about Russia MadameButterfly 23 hrs ago #9

lbj kept nixon's meddling quiet rampartd 9 hrs ago #23

I don't think Carter knew at the time MadameButterfly 8 hrs ago #25

i believe bani sadr before any repub. rampartd 6 hrs ago #34

These Beltway lifers are marinated in institutional CYAness Bluetus 6 hrs ago #36

Why not after the election then? MichMan 22 hrs ago #10

Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 22 hrs ago #12

I was referring to the DOJ, not President Biden MichMan 22 hrs ago #15

Okay, thanks. Sorry I misinterpreted it. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 18 hrs ago #19

You mean, Merrick Garland who didn't even prosecute MadameButterfly 8 hrs ago #26

It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one. Justice matters. 22 hrs ago #11

K&R UTUSN 22 hrs ago #13

Yes. Investigate Biden..... Don't stop there. Norrrm 22 hrs ago #14

Love your signature line! Poster/bumper sticker material. KPN 4 hrs ago #40

I really don't give a fuck about release/not release, sealed/not sealed cadoman 21 hrs ago #17

Or maybe there were other big names on the list too Polybius 19 hrs ago #18

Good. It needs to be rocked. Scrivener7 7 hrs ago #28

Ding ding ding Hornedfrog2000 6 hrs ago #32

Well, too bad. We need to know THAT, too. calimary 5 hrs ago #37

Even more reason to release them -- what have we got to lose at this point? KPN 4 hrs ago #41

Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything. Oopsie Daisy 8 hrs ago #24

He literally is Hornedfrog2000 6 hrs ago #33

Yep... like I said. Oopsie Daisy 5 hrs ago #38

The Biden administration, in its political perspective, still played the game like it was the 70's. lees1975 7 hrs ago #27

It seems like the doj was complicit in covering up for tRump ecstatic 7 hrs ago #30

The OP stated the files were "legally available" in Jan 2024 Martin Eden 7 hrs ago #31

We look completely feckless Hornedfrog2000 6 hrs ago #35

We don't look feckless. They however, look rather degenerate. Torchlight 4 hrs ago #43