General Discussion

Hornedfrog2000

(399 posts)

32. Ding ding ding

Reply to Polybius (Reply #18)

Mon Jul 21, 2025, 10:14 AM

Jul 21

The reason this will never see the light of day. Too many dem friends on the list.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Why didn't BIDEN release the Epstein files!?" Well.... [View all] CousinIT Jul 20 OP

Is "January 2024" a typo" Martin Eden Jul 20 #1

No. They were released January 2024 CousinIT Jul 20 #3

Thanks for the clarification Martin Eden Jul 20 #16

Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular, KPN Jul 21 #39

The president is responsible for serving and protecting the country Martin Eden Jul 21 #42

I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding KPN Jul 21 #44

Yes, clarity is important to prevent misunderstandings Martin Eden Jul 21 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author Melon Jul 20 #20

Didnt her trial end in 2021? oldmanlynn Jul 21 #29

Wasn't it an old story from Clinton/W Bush eras? Reopening that can of worms... brush Jul 20 #2

I can't see the harm to Hillary. Codifer Jul 20 #5

Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files. brush Jul 21 #21

We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules. mackdaddy Jul 20 #4

Garland would never have done it, even if they weren't sealed. lees1975 Jul 20 #8

smith's report on the classified info would be interesting. rampartd Jul 21 #22

The argument the MAGAts keep making is The Mouth Jul 20 #6

I can see why they wouldn't be released after January 2024 nuxvomica Jul 20 #7

Yeah, like Obama didn't release what he knew about Russia MadameButterfly Jul 20 #9

lbj kept nixon's meddling quiet rampartd Jul 21 #23

I don't think Carter knew at the time MadameButterfly Jul 21 #25

i believe bani sadr before any repub. rampartd Jul 21 #34

Great article MadameButterfly Jul 21 #46

These Beltway lifers are marinated in institutional CYAness Bluetus Jul 21 #36

Why not after the election then? MichMan Jul 20 #10

Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 20 #12

I was referring to the DOJ, not President Biden MichMan Jul 20 #15

Okay, thanks. Sorry I misinterpreted it. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 20 #19

You mean, Merrick Garland who didn't even prosecute MadameButterfly Jul 21 #26

It's a stupid rule and a very dangerous one. Justice matters. Jul 20 #11

K&R UTUSN Jul 20 #13

Yes. Investigate Biden..... Don't stop there. Norrrm Jul 20 #14

Love your signature line! Poster/bumper sticker material. KPN Jul 21 #40

I really don't give a fuck about release/not release, sealed/not sealed cadoman Jul 20 #17

Or maybe there were other big names on the list too Polybius Jul 20 #18

Good. It needs to be rocked. Scrivener7 Jul 21 #28

Ding ding ding Hornedfrog2000 Jul 21 #32

Well, too bad. We need to know THAT, too. calimary Jul 21 #37

Even more reason to release them -- what have we got to lose at this point? KPN Jul 21 #41

Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything. Oopsie Daisy Jul 21 #24

He literally is Hornedfrog2000 Jul 21 #33

Yep... like I said. Oopsie Daisy Jul 21 #38

The Biden administration, in its political perspective, still played the game like it was the 70's. lees1975 Jul 21 #27

It seems like the doj was complicit in covering up for tRump ecstatic Jul 21 #30

The OP stated the files were "legally available" in Jan 2024 Martin Eden Jul 21 #31

We look completely feckless Hornedfrog2000 Jul 21 #35

We don't look feckless. They however, look rather degenerate. Torchlight Jul 21 #43