Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "UNDERAGE WOMEN" is an oxymoron. "UNDERAGE GIRL" is redundant. [View all]Wiz Imp
(6,614 posts)89. You're entitled to your opinion but that doesn't mean most people agree with you. IMO most people absolutely consider
17 and under children. I certainly hope there aren't many people who consider a 17 year old as an adult. Legally, in the US, anyone under 18 is a child. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines child as, "A human being below the age of 18 years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier." The NIH defines keywords referring to age as follows:
we use keywords that identify the age band(s) of the studied patients: fetuses (not yet born), newborns (first day of life), neonates (less than 1 month old), infants (up to 1 year old), children (birth to 17 years old), adolescents (1317 years old), young adults or adults (18 years and older)
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9411830/#:~:text=Further%2C%20definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9Cpediatric%E2%80%9D,years%20and%20older%20%5B6%5D.
It's also interesting you interchange the word children with kids. I hear tons of people calling others kids well into their 20s.
I agree with the OP. I would not call anyone under 18 a woman, so anyone under the age of 18 is a girl which does make "underage girl" redundant.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Someday That type of thinking will be So Diminished it will rarely, if ever affect a victim...
electric_blue68
Jul 25
#86
Technically speaking, neither Trump nor Epstein could rightly be called pedophiles.
Jedi Guy
Jul 25
#72
You're entitled to your opinion but that doesn't mean most people agree with you. IMO most people absolutely consider
Wiz Imp
Jul 25
#89
The Ohio State wrestling case was a little different (not that it was less serious)
Ocelot II
Jul 25
#36
There's also the issue of the GIRL not knowing her rights when she's violated ...
FakeNoose
Jul 25
#34
As a senior male, an UNDERAGE woman is a 20 year old woman with an 70 year old man
LiberalArkie
Jul 25
#35
Pedophilia is INCURABLE -- the only place the belong is on a deserted island or in a prison cell.
OMGWTF
Jul 25
#37
It's not quite that black and white. I think simply calling the victims "girls" is worse.
thesquanderer
Jul 25
#43
I frequently use girl for females of whatever age when I talk about people who are not men.
aeromanKC
Jul 25
#58
"Daughter of", "son of", "offspring of", or, in the case of orange, etc., "spawn of".
niyad
Jul 25
#71
They are children. Once again, children get that end of the stick with shit on it.
twodogsbarking
Jul 26
#102