Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Do SNAP Food Restrictions Help Health, or Punish Poor People? [View all]

GARY, INDIANA Driving through Northwest Indiana feels a bit like going back in time. Winding roads, barns, and lush green fields in the rural farm communities give way to hulking steel mills, tall smokestacks, massive warehouses, and art deco movie palaces as you hit Gary. Look a little closer, though, and the 50s ideal of country life leading into the big city becomes hazier. The movie palace, home of the 2002 Miss USA pageant (run by an impresario named Donald Trump), is boarded up, the windows broken. The jobs, or at least most of them, are gone, along with many of the people who worked at them.
Many of those in this region rely on government aid in some way, whether it be farm subsidies or social safety net benefits like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. In Indiana, 1 out of every 11 residents receives SNAP benefits. The states staunchly Republican government has made a practice of canceling or defunding safety-net programs, but this year there was a twist. In April, Gov. Mike Braun allied himself with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.s Make America Healthy Again agenda, signing nine executive orders for the Make Indiana Healthy Again initiative.
One of those executive orders empowered the state to submit a waiver request to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), asking for authorization to restrict what low-income Hoosiers who receive SNAP benefits can purchase. In May, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins approved the waiver. Starting in January, SNAP recipients in Indiana wont be able to use SNAP to buy candy or sugary drinks like soda and some juices.
So far, Indiana is one of six states that have been approved by the USDA to ban sugary foods from SNAP, but experts say that theyre monitoring at least eight others that might follow suit. Earlier this year, eight House Republicans introduced a bill that would do the same thing.
Many of those in this region rely on government aid in some way, whether it be farm subsidies or social safety net benefits like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. In Indiana, 1 out of every 11 residents receives SNAP benefits. The states staunchly Republican government has made a practice of canceling or defunding safety-net programs, but this year there was a twist. In April, Gov. Mike Braun allied himself with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.s Make America Healthy Again agenda, signing nine executive orders for the Make Indiana Healthy Again initiative.
One of those executive orders empowered the state to submit a waiver request to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), asking for authorization to restrict what low-income Hoosiers who receive SNAP benefits can purchase. In May, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins approved the waiver. Starting in January, SNAP recipients in Indiana wont be able to use SNAP to buy candy or sugary drinks like soda and some juices.
So far, Indiana is one of six states that have been approved by the USDA to ban sugary foods from SNAP, but experts say that theyre monitoring at least eight others that might follow suit. Earlier this year, eight House Republicans introduced a bill that would do the same thing.
https://prospect.org/health/2025-07-30-do-snap-food-restrictions-help-health-punish-poor-people/
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

They just punish. Food is food pretty much. Most food problems are from over eating, not what your eating
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#1
Did I say it was water? No it's sugar water. Not a problem unless you guzzle a quart at a time.
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#5
So ban all processed food for snap recipients? That's dumb. The restrictions are dumb.
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#7
Their point is pushing the right wing "welfare queen" angle in new clothes (new wording for old trope)
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 30
#73
It's not you. I was answering your question you asked of the right wing troll. They got banned for the reason I cited.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 30
#76
Restrictions punish and people get weird about food "morality" REALLY quickly.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#4
No, repukes start by eliminating soda and end with eliminating the program
questionseverything
Jul 30
#38
So since you are such an expert, I assume your eating habits are "perfect "?
questionseverything
Jul 30
#46
And also, the homeless. A bag of beans to someone who, by definition, has no kitchen to cook in, is just insulting.
CTyankee
Jul 30
#20
I wonder if that's how their mamas raised them -- to inventory a stranger's cart and pay strict attention to how ...
Alice B.
Jul 30
#39
I hear you. I know this quite personally because I've used an EBT card -- even an average white lady
Alice B.
Jul 30
#79
If you have a microwave. One innovation is pop top cans so a can opener isn't needed.
cbabe
Jul 30
#32
It's very disappointing to see holier than thou types pushing this shit on a democratic site
questionseverything
Jul 30
#64
FWIW, there's very little difference in the kind of purchases SNAP households make compared to non-SNAP households.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#56
Besides the obvious objections from industries, one of the reasons the USDA is generally loathe to implement
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#65
Exactly, it would just run up the cost which of course means more people can't get food
questionseverything
Jul 30
#67
Ah, *here's* where the dog is buried. You're mad about the way other people choose to eat.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#88