Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Is So Much of What We Call "History" Wrong? [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(104,373 posts)10. Ironically, your version of the scan of Shakespeare's grave is completely wrong
Key findings:
The GPR survey found that William Shakespeare, his wife Anne Hathaway and other members of the family whose ledger (grave) stones lie beside his, were not buried in a large family vault deep underground, as has long been thought, but in shallow graves beneath their tombstones.
Each grave is shallow in depth, less than 3 feet, and there is no evidence of coffins.
There is evidence of a mysterious and significant repair to the head end of William Shakespeares grave, leading to Kevin Colls theory that this localised repair was needed to correct a sinking of the floor possibly caused by a previous disturbance to the grave.
Kevin Colls believes these findings give new credence to a story published in The Argosy magazine in 1879, hitherto dismissed as fiction, which claimed that Shakespeares skull was stolen from his shallow grave by trophy hunters in 1794.
William Shakespeares grave was found to be significantly longer than his short stone extending west towards the head end, making it the same size as, and in line with, the other family graves. (Annes grave is also longer than her stone suggests.
https://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/archaeology/projects/secret-history-shakespeares-tomb/
The GPR survey found that William Shakespeare, his wife Anne Hathaway and other members of the family whose ledger (grave) stones lie beside his, were not buried in a large family vault deep underground, as has long been thought, but in shallow graves beneath their tombstones.
Each grave is shallow in depth, less than 3 feet, and there is no evidence of coffins.
There is evidence of a mysterious and significant repair to the head end of William Shakespeares grave, leading to Kevin Colls theory that this localised repair was needed to correct a sinking of the floor possibly caused by a previous disturbance to the grave.
Kevin Colls believes these findings give new credence to a story published in The Argosy magazine in 1879, hitherto dismissed as fiction, which claimed that Shakespeares skull was stolen from his shallow grave by trophy hunters in 1794.
William Shakespeares grave was found to be significantly longer than his short stone extending west towards the head end, making it the same size as, and in line with, the other family graves. (Annes grave is also longer than her stone suggests.
https://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/archaeology/projects/secret-history-shakespeares-tomb/
"Lidar", by the way, stands for "light detection and ranging" or "laser imaging, detection, and ranging", and would be useless for examining an underground grave. They used Ground Penetrating Radar.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Ironically, your version of the scan of Shakespeare's grave is completely wrong
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 30
#10
The irony of your attempt to spin this against the reality is quite hilarious
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 30
#13
I cited the Shakespeare myth specifically for the dynamic you are helping to illustrate
GreatGazoo
Jul 30
#14
Sure, go on denying what the people who did the scan said, if it makes you feel OK
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 31
#22
So we've gone from "Shakespeare isn't buried there. It's empty" to 5, including him, buried in shallow graves in shrouds
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 31
#24
According to Colls and science, Is Shakespeare's skull in that infant-sized "grave"? Yes or No
GreatGazoo
Jul 31
#25
They don't know if the skull is in there or not, but the grave is not "infant-sized"
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 31
#30
"It's very very convincing to me that his skull isn't at Holy Trinity at all." - Colls
GreatGazoo
Aug 1
#31
SInce you mentioned "Gilgamesh", I'll leave you this historical tidbit: Gilgamesh gave birth to Hamas.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
Jul 30
#21