Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do SNAP Food Restrictions Help Health, or Punish Poor People? [View all]choie
(5,933 posts)90. The "government" isn't paying for it.
We as a community are paying for it, including many who are receiving SNAP. It's called commons and we pay for it through taxes. And if the government wants to do something helpful to combat obesity, diabetes, etc., maybe they should try to make Americans lives better by addressing the real causes of financial insecurity, which causes anxiety and illness.
Also, SNAP-Ed, a program created to educated SNAP recipients on nutrition, healthy food choices and cooking, has been completely eliminated. So much for your theory that they're forbidding the purchase of certain foods in order to promote better health.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They just punish. Food is food pretty much. Most food problems are from over eating, not what your eating
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#1
Did I say it was water? No it's sugar water. Not a problem unless you guzzle a quart at a time.
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#5
So ban all processed food for snap recipients? That's dumb. The restrictions are dumb.
Blues Heron
Jul 30
#7
Their point is pushing the right wing "welfare queen" angle in new clothes (new wording for old trope)
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 30
#73
It's not you. I was answering your question you asked of the right wing troll. They got banned for the reason I cited.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 30
#76
Restrictions punish and people get weird about food "morality" REALLY quickly.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#4
No, repukes start by eliminating soda and end with eliminating the program
questionseverything
Jul 30
#38
So since you are such an expert, I assume your eating habits are "perfect "?
questionseverything
Jul 30
#46
And also, the homeless. A bag of beans to someone who, by definition, has no kitchen to cook in, is just insulting.
CTyankee
Jul 30
#20
I wonder if that's how their mamas raised them -- to inventory a stranger's cart and pay strict attention to how ...
Alice B.
Jul 30
#39
I hear you. I know this quite personally because I've used an EBT card -- even an average white lady
Alice B.
Jul 30
#79
If you have a microwave. One innovation is pop top cans so a can opener isn't needed.
cbabe
Jul 30
#32
It's very disappointing to see holier than thou types pushing this shit on a democratic site
questionseverything
Jul 30
#64
FWIW, there's very little difference in the kind of purchases SNAP households make compared to non-SNAP households.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#56
Besides the obvious objections from industries, one of the reasons the USDA is generally loathe to implement
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#65
Exactly, it would just run up the cost which of course means more people can't get food
questionseverything
Jul 30
#67
Ah, *here's* where the dog is buried. You're mad about the way other people choose to eat.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 30
#88