Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,173 posts)
23. Kevin Colls says there is no skull under that stone and no coffin
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 09:44 AM
Jul 31

Can we agree on that?

In Coll's final report:

"Neither grave appears to be full sized....The surprising result of the GPR survey is that there is no evidence for even a moderately sized family vault."

"As for the grave presumed to be that of William Shakespeare (grave 2) this appears at first sight to be
unnaturally short since, neither it nor any of the other family graves appear to extend into the area
beneath the altar step. From figures 10 and 13 this grave does not appear large enough to contain an
adult male and the evidence could potentially be construed, as has been suggested, that the grave does not
contain a burial.
"

"The results of the GPR investigation have laid to rest a number of historical myths about the Shakespeare
graves. The data are consistent with a historical tale which was originally thought unlikely since the data
confirm that the grave thought to be that of William Shakespeare has been partially cut across by another
feature, presumably in an attempt to restore the stability of the floor. The data also show that the
Shakespeare family was not buried in a traditional vault, although some of the area is delineated by
brickwork but in a discrete line of simple shallow graves. The use of a very high frequency antenna has
allowed the deduction that burial for each of the five members of the family was in a shroud, not in a
coffin from the absence of small metal artefacts in the area of their interment. Comparison of the data for
the central three graves suggests that there may be foundation to the story of Susanna Shakespeare's grave
being disturbed even if it is not possible to conclude whether she was exhumed and subsequently reinterred
elsewhere. "

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/231752969.pdf

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The "winners" write it. H2O Man Jul 30 #1
This NewHendoLib Jul 30 #2
That, and the fact that most people don't give a damn thucythucy Jul 30 #4
"How much do we devote, yearly, to the preservation..."? Billions of $$$ GreatGazoo Jul 30 #7
I specifically tried to exclude tourism and tourist attractions, thucythucy Jul 30 #15
I hear you on NFL expenses vs history preservation GreatGazoo Jul 30 #17
I agree that the study of history has and is making great strides. thucythucy Aug 2 #33
Americans are more interested in science fiction than history. thought crime Jul 30 #18
That simple malaise Jul 30 #8
Not always TnDem Jul 30 #12
But which "holy" texts were chosen to be included in the Bible, Aristus Jul 30 #16
The Bible isn't history. thought crime Jul 30 #19
"Nobody reads anymore." Kid Berwyn Jul 31 #27
;--{) Goonch Jul 31 #28
Countering Criticism of the Warren Report (CIA, PDF) Kid Berwyn Jul 31 #29
There are no facts. Only interpretations. Friedrich Nietzsche Ping Tung Jul 30 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author thought crime Jul 30 #20
To a certain degree it can only be an art ITAL Jul 30 #5
"Why it happened" is much more debatable than 'What happened' GreatGazoo Jul 30 #6
Nice OP malaise Jul 30 #9
Ironically, your version of the scan of Shakespeare's grave is completely wrong muriel_volestrangler Jul 30 #10
GPR shows no skull, no casket or coffin, not even nails from a rotted coffin. GreatGazoo Jul 30 #11
The irony of your attempt to spin this against the reality is quite hilarious muriel_volestrangler Jul 30 #13
I cited the Shakespeare myth specifically for the dynamic you are helping to illustrate GreatGazoo Jul 30 #14
Sure, go on denying what the people who did the scan said, if it makes you feel OK muriel_volestrangler Jul 31 #22
Kevin Colls says there is no skull under that stone and no coffin GreatGazoo Jul 31 #23
So we've gone from "Shakespeare isn't buried there. It's empty" to 5, including him, buried in shallow graves in shrouds muriel_volestrangler Jul 31 #24
According to Colls and science, Is Shakespeare's skull in that infant-sized "grave"? Yes or No GreatGazoo Jul 31 #25
They don't know if the skull is in there or not, but the grave is not "infant-sized" muriel_volestrangler Jul 31 #30
"It's very very convincing to me that his skull isn't at Holy Trinity at all." - Colls GreatGazoo Aug 1 #31
In your arguments in this thread, you have said: muriel_volestrangler Aug 1 #32
SInce you mentioned "Gilgamesh", I'll leave you this historical tidbit: Gilgamesh gave birth to Hamas. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jul 30 #21
Well said! nt intrepidity Jul 31 #26
It is manipulated thru time to say what one wants republianmushroom Aug 2 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Is So Much of What We...»Reply #23