General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Is So Much of What We Call "History" Wrong? [View all]GreatGazoo
(4,173 posts)And why would Colls theorize that Susanna was exhumed and buried elsewhere if his GPR proved 5 bodies in those 5 "graves"?
My OP explores a long trend in the genre and discipline of history moving away from legend, myth and biografiction toward accuracy, primary sources and reality. The Shakespeare myth is heavily defended yet it crumbles under any scrutiny so it is a great example of how inaccuracy is defended, excused, perpetuated and monetized. The "Shakespeare Birthplace" was built in 1864. The "grave" is unmarked and contained no skull or coffin. The will of Shakspere was suppressed and mistranscribed because its contents do not fit the popular myth. The bogus deer poaching story was repeated as truth for 100+ years. The mulberry tree was sold as trinkets a hundred times over. Thousands of innocent tourists are ripped off by these fraudsters every year. I don't find any of that to be funny or ironic.
Colls is being coy but reasonable people can read his conclusions for themselves and understand that, at the very least, he is saying there is no skull or evidence of a coffin in that bogus child-sized "grave".
Edit history
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):